2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-019-4576-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comorbidities and polypharmacy among HIV-positive patients aged 50 years and over: a case–control study

Abstract: Objective This study was to determine and compare the prevalences of polypharmacy and comorbidities in patients aged 50 years or older with those patients younger than 50 years in a Mexican population. Results One hundred and twenty-five patients were enrolled, 60 (48%) were aged 50 years or older. The median CD4+ cell counts were 509 cells/μL (interquartile range [IQR]: 324–730) for the older patients and 384 cells/μL (IQR: 262–562) ( P = 0.0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for exclusion are laid out in Figure 1 . Thereafter, 35 potentially relevant studies were selected for full text review, of which 23 21 , 36 57 studies satisfied the inclusion for the network meta-analysis. The source of data for the selected studies ranged from HIV outpatient clinics and University/Tertiary hospital pharmacies to multicentre AIDS cohort studies ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for exclusion are laid out in Figure 1 . Thereafter, 35 potentially relevant studies were selected for full text review, of which 23 21 , 36 57 studies satisfied the inclusion for the network meta-analysis. The source of data for the selected studies ranged from HIV outpatient clinics and University/Tertiary hospital pharmacies to multicentre AIDS cohort studies ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a total of 36 de nitions of polypharmacy, with studies further divided based on the magnitude of polypharmacy (Table 1); minor polypharmacy (N = 3); major polypharmacy (N = 29); "severe" polypharmacy (N = 2); "excessive" polypharmacy (N = 1); "higher" polypharmacy (N = 1) (Table 2). Major 29 [2], [6], [8], [15], [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] Severe 2 [23] [26] [39] Excessive 1 [11] Higher 1 [39] Duration of Polypharmacy Amongst the included studies, 16% (N = 5) incorporated the duration of treatment to the de nition of polypharmacy, while a signi cant proportion 84% (N = 26) only provided the numerical de nition of polypharmacy with no additional information on its duration. Gimeno-Gracia et al further strati ed drug exposure based on the following duration: greater than 1 day; greater than 90 days; and greater than 180 days [14,36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven studies from the USA [22, 23, 26, 28, 31-34, 36, 37, 41] , three from Nigeria [25,38,39] , three from France [12,29,40] and one each from Denmark [24] , South Africa [27] , Germany [42] , India [30] , Ethiopia [43] , Canada [35] , Malawi [44] , Mexico [45] , Uganda [46] , and the United Kingdom and Zambia [47] were included. All studies were published in English.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies reported that some patients were receiving ART [37,40,42] . Two studies reported ART use [26,45] but did not specify the percentage of participants on ART. Five studies did not report on ART [12,22,23,25,27] , while seventeen studies reported the percentages of patients receiving ART ranging from 50-100% [24, 28-36, 38, 39, 41, 43, 44, 46, 47] .…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%