2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community Participation Measures for People With Disabilities: A Systematic Review of Content From an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We acknowledge that the participation characterised in this study may fail to recognise participation events such as employment, social and recreational roles, which may be fulfilled from within a person's home. However, by selectively defining participation in this study as community participation, we have attempted to specifically characterise activities outside of the home setting 27. We sought to do this as participation outside of the home is likely to present greater mobility and social challenges and therefore greater community integration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that the participation characterised in this study may fail to recognise participation events such as employment, social and recreational roles, which may be fulfilled from within a person's home. However, by selectively defining participation in this study as community participation, we have attempted to specifically characterise activities outside of the home setting 27. We sought to do this as participation outside of the home is likely to present greater mobility and social challenges and therefore greater community integration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore in development of measures, decisions must be made as to the level of approach (individual or societal), range of participation environments to be included and the elements within that participation area to be addressed. It is not possible to encompass the complete environmental context in any great detail as demonstrated by Noonan et al ( 2009 ) and Chang et al ( 2013 ) work reviewing the content of a variety of participation instruments. Therefore, decisions about the focus of measurement require very careful consideration.…”
Section: Current Forms Of Measurementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Unfortunately, the ICF framework provides little guidance to researchers and clinicians on which factors are most important to address in order to encourage full participation in life roles. Furthermore, research has been hindered by participation measures that are not adequately validated, narrowly focused, and/or do not account for differences in individual preferences about engaging in activities across different life roles (6, 7). Thus, many questions remain about the factors that influence participation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%