Environmental Governance in Latin America 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-50572-9_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community Consultations: Local Responses to Large-Scale Mining in Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People may not only disagree about the intervention at stake or how the problem is conceived, but also about how to deal with such disagreements. For example, in conflicts around mining projects with potentially high environmental impacts on surrounding ecosystems, local populations often prefer a local referendum as a decision making tool, while mining companies frequently prefer the adoption of a compensation rationale [40]. The key point is that such choices do not only reflect different strategies in conflict management, but most importantly different ways of relating to nature and languages of valuation.…”
Section: [Insert Table 1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People may not only disagree about the intervention at stake or how the problem is conceived, but also about how to deal with such disagreements. For example, in conflicts around mining projects with potentially high environmental impacts on surrounding ecosystems, local populations often prefer a local referendum as a decision making tool, while mining companies frequently prefer the adoption of a compensation rationale [40]. The key point is that such choices do not only reflect different strategies in conflict management, but most importantly different ways of relating to nature and languages of valuation.…”
Section: [Insert Table 1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the contradictory nature of the modern state generates multiple orientations and conflicts among state agencies with disparate goals (Göbel and Ulloa, 2014;Harrison, 1996;Hochstetler and Keck, 2007;McAllister, 2008;Merlinsky, 2013a;Scheberle, 2005), which in turn are exacerbated by the struggle between the different levels of government (Fearnside, 2003;Gutiérrez, 2018;Urkidi and Walter, 2011;Walter and Urkidi, 2016). On the other hand, it creates opportunities for the mobilization and influence of social organizations concerned with environmental protection (Gutiérrez, 2018;Hochstetler and Keck, 2007).…”
Section: Environmental Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance, then, is rooted in violent pasts of racism and exclusion (Caxaj et al, 2013). Community consultations have often been organized as a way of challenging top-down consultations (Walter & Urkidi, 2016) and Environmental Impact Assessments, which are perceived as a limited way to express concerns or influence development projects (Perrault, 2013). Although this form of resistance has produced processes of engagement and participation on the local level and has resulted in numerous municipalities and regions in Latin America declaring themselves 'free of mining', it generally does not in-fluence national decision-making processes directly; only in very few cases has it actually stopped extractive projects.…”
Section: Resistance and Violence In Natural Resource Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, there is a growing, well-organized, multi-scaled resistance against megaprojects. People have organized community consultations, prepared lawsuits, gone to human rights courts to resist gold mining, palm oil plantations and power dams (Walter & Urkidi, 2016). In the course of growing social mobilization, the language of resistance has moved slowly from demanding inclusion in the decision-making processes about resource use towards a discourse of territorial autonomy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%