Communication with patients with limited prognosis—an integrative mixed-methods evaluation study

Abstract

Purpose Oncological societies advocate the continuity of care, specialized communication, and early integration of palliative care. To comply with these recommendations, an interprofessional, longitudinally-structured communication concept, the Milestone Communication Approach (MCA), was previously developed, implemented, and evaluated. Our research question is: what are possible explanations from the patient perspective for prognosis and advance care planning being rarely a topic and for finding no differences between MCA and control groups concerning distress, quality of life, and mood? Methods A pragmatic epistemological stance guided the study. A mixed-methods design was chosen including a pragmatic randomized trial (n = 171), qualitative interviews with patients (n = 13) and caregivers (n = 12), and a content analysis (133 milestone conversations, 54 follow-up calls). Data analysis involved the pillar integration process. Results Two pillar themes emerged: 1 “approaching prognosis and advance care planning”; 2 “living with a life-threatening illness”. Information on prognosis seemed to be offered, but patients’ reactions were diverse. Some patients have to deal with having advanced lung cancer while nonetheless feeling healthy and seem not to be ready for prognostic information. All patients seemed to struggle to preserve their quality of life and keep distress under control. Conclusion Attending to patients’ questions, worries and needs early in a disease trajectory seems key to helping patients adjust to living with lung cancer. If necessary clinicians should name their predicament: having to inform about prognosis versus respecting the patients wish to avoid it. Research should support better understanding of patients not wishing for prognostic information to successfully improve communication strategies. Trial registration Registration: German Clinical Trial Register No. DRKS00013649, registration date 12/22/2017, (https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00013649) and No. DRKS00013469, registration date 12/22/2017, (https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00013469).

Radiologists’ Communicative Role in Breast Cancer Patient Management: Beyond Diagnosis

“…The skills that are the subject of patient communication training are varied and often described disparately [ 9 ].…”

Os desafios da integração de cuidados paliativos na emergência

“…Houve, ainda, ênfase sobre o fato de que quando há um entendimento e um consenso dos passos a serem seguidos, e as escolhas de assistência são definidas, as repercussões para o paciente são mais benéficas (CHESTER et al, 2021;PUN et al, 2022). Logo, concluiu-se que é importante que os envolvidos no cuidado estejam atentos às preferências, desejos e crenças do paciente (SIEGLE et al, 2022). Para tanto, é importante que não haja lacunas na comunicação e que os pacientes estejam conscientes de sua real condição (NAUCK; JASPERS, 2021).…”