2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3590364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication: Avoiding unbound anions in density functional calculations

Abstract: A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
154
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42 For electron affinities (EAs), ∆SCF predictions A N = E N −E N +1 are also found to be in agreement with experiment with the central caveat that ∆SCF predictions for EAs are only possible insofar as the system can accommodate the added electron within the approximation used; this condition on the stability of anionic states is necessary to calculate the ground-state energy of negatively charged systems. In practical terms, failure to stabilize anions is frequent within approximate DFT 43 and arises from spurious self-interaction whereby an electron can interact with itself through the nonphysical contribution from its own charge density to the effective Kohn-Sham Hamiltonian. 25 Therefore, in order to obtain reliable predictions for orbital levels (especially, for frontier donor and acceptor levels that determine the charge-transfer properties of the system), it is crucial to satisfy the following conditions: (a) the correspondence between the effective orbital levels and ∆SCF total-energy differences must be imposed; (b) the established accuracy of ∆SCF energies must be preserved; and (c) the calculations must circumvent the inability of approximate functionals to stabilize negatively charged systems.…”
Section: Present Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 For electron affinities (EAs), ∆SCF predictions A N = E N −E N +1 are also found to be in agreement with experiment with the central caveat that ∆SCF predictions for EAs are only possible insofar as the system can accommodate the added electron within the approximation used; this condition on the stability of anionic states is necessary to calculate the ground-state energy of negatively charged systems. In practical terms, failure to stabilize anions is frequent within approximate DFT 43 and arises from spurious self-interaction whereby an electron can interact with itself through the nonphysical contribution from its own charge density to the effective Kohn-Sham Hamiltonian. 25 Therefore, in order to obtain reliable predictions for orbital levels (especially, for frontier donor and acceptor levels that determine the charge-transfer properties of the system), it is crucial to satisfy the following conditions: (a) the correspondence between the effective orbital levels and ∆SCF total-energy differences must be imposed; (b) the established accuracy of ∆SCF energies must be preserved; and (c) the calculations must circumvent the inability of approximate functionals to stabilize negatively charged systems.…”
Section: Present Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the electron affinity (EA) of the neutral can be explored as the IP of the singly charged anion (barring geometrical relaxation). Unfortunately, for the atoms and very small molecules studied here, it is well-known [110][111][112] that with common semi-local approximations negative ions of small systems may erroneously be predicted to be unstable. However, when performing calculations with finite basis sets, as in, e.g., [113], unbound states can be artificially stabilized [114], because the basis set effectively confines the unbound electron to the vicinity of the neutral system.…”
Section: B Evaluating the Test Set -A Systematic Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of electron affinities remains a challenging and controversial issue for density-functional calculations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . In particular, local and semi-local approximate exchangecorrelation functionals typically provide a poor description of anionic species due to large self-interaction errors (SIEs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%