“…This consideration is supported by the observations that in patients with communicative and non-communicative hydrocephalus, transmantle pressure is absent (Stephensen et al, 2002). All of the evidence supports the idea that the transmantle pressure gradient may not be necessary or instrumental for the development of hydrocephalus, and that some other factors such as an increase in the ventricular CSF pulse pressure without affecting the CSF pressure (Di Rocco et al, 1978), an impairment of systolic-diastolic displacement of the CSF with the development of periventricular ischemia (Miše et al 1996), changes in the arterial pulsations (Greitz, 2004 and, an increase in ventricular CSF osmolarity without affecting the CSF pressure (Krishnamuthy et al, 2009), and venous compliance (Bateman, 2000 and2003) may play an important role in the development of that pathological process (see Section 8. -Mechanisms of hydrocephalus development which are not in accordance with the classical hypothesis of CSF hydrodynamics).…”