2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.07.029249
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicability distance reveals hidden patterns of Alzheimer disease

Abstract: AbstractThe communicability distance between pairs of regions in human brain is used as a quantitative proxy for studying Alzheimer disease. Using this distance we obtain the shortest communicability path lengths between different regions of brain networks from Alzheimer diseased (AD) patients and healthy cohorts (HC). We show that the shortest communicability path length is significantly better than the shortest topological path length in distinguishing AD patients from HC. Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, our results corroborate previous reports on the utility of communicability to investigate a range of diverse neuroscience questions [39]. Examples include studies on the impact of stroke lesions [69], effects of neurodegeneration [70], simulations of neural gain fluctuations [71], and pharmacogenetic manipulation of brain regions [72]. More generally, we add to mounting empirical evidence challenging the notion that communication in brain networks occurs exclusively via topological shortest paths [30, 31, 73], an assumption built into many popular graph measures in network neuroscience (e.g., betweenness centrality or global efficiency).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Finally, our results corroborate previous reports on the utility of communicability to investigate a range of diverse neuroscience questions [39]. Examples include studies on the impact of stroke lesions [69], effects of neurodegeneration [70], simulations of neural gain fluctuations [71], and pharmacogenetic manipulation of brain regions [72]. More generally, we add to mounting empirical evidence challenging the notion that communication in brain networks occurs exclusively via topological shortest paths [30, 31, 73], an assumption built into many popular graph measures in network neuroscience (e.g., betweenness centrality or global efficiency).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%