2011
DOI: 10.1364/ao.50.002170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on “Accuracy of Raman lidar water vapor calibration and its applicability to long-term measurements”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows pictures of beam spot samples that we observed at the output of our 1 mm diameter fiber for various positions and tilts of the injected light beam (from a 468 nm LED with matched numerical apertures of NA in = 0.22). Similar changes in the output beam diameter have been reported by Whiteman et al (2011). In addition to the changes in size and shape of the output beam, we also observed that the NA of the emerging beam can be larger than specified by the manufacturer.…”
Section: System (Gnss) Measurementssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Figure 3 shows pictures of beam spot samples that we observed at the output of our 1 mm diameter fiber for various positions and tilts of the injected light beam (from a 468 nm LED with matched numerical apertures of NA in = 0.22). Similar changes in the output beam diameter have been reported by Whiteman et al (2011). In addition to the changes in size and shape of the output beam, we also observed that the NA of the emerging beam can be larger than specified by the manufacturer.…”
Section: System (Gnss) Measurementssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Various approaches have been tested to calibrate the water vapour measurements of a Raman lidar system. However, calibration issues are still pending and debated (Whiteman et al, 2011a;. Though an absolute calibration of the entire lidar system is theoretically possible (Vaughan et al, 1988;Sherlock et al, 1999b;Venable et al, 2011), the signal ratio is usually scaled to various external water vapour measurements (radiosonde, microwave radiometer, Global Positioning System (GPS),.…”
Section: Water Vapour Mixing Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, for the MAIDO RMR-H 2 O lidar two methods are used: the calibration lamp (CL), and the passive daytime observations (PDOs). As highlighted by the works of Leblanc and McDermid (2008) and of Whiteman et al (2011a) for CL and by the work of Hoareau et al (2009) for PDOs, these methods cannot be used to provide an accurate quantification of the system optical efficiency, but only to identify ISPs.…”
Section: System Monitoring: Calibration Lamp and Passive Daytime Obsementioning
confidence: 99%