“…OME fuels have received increasing attention because of their suitability as clean and renewable diesel replacement fuels for light- and heavy-duty transport and in stationary power generation, in part using RCCI approaches and dual-fuel combinations. − They are discussed as drop-in fuels in a given vehicle and fuel infrastructure, with a possibility to adapt the chain length of the fuel molecule and its associated physicochemical characteristics to the respective process, ,, thus presenting advantages for a short- to midterm transition toward a sustainable transport sector . In addition to GHG savings, OME combustion can be performed with very low pollutant emissions, regarding both, NO x and soot. , Because of the absence of carbon–carbon bonds in the fuel molecule, the sooting tendency is greatly reduced, circumventing the usual soot–NO x trade-off in diesel combustion and allowing for measures such as high EGR rates to reduce NO x . , Dedicated studies have been performed to characterize the soot formation of OME 3 and of OME-diesel blends, , also in comparison with Fischer–Tropsch (FT) diesel, in part relying on optical inspection of the combustion process. − For example, high-speed OH* chemiluminescence and planar laser-induced incandescence (see also Section ) have been combined to analyze injection, spray formation, ignition, soot volume fraction, and spatial distribution of soot in a constant-volume vessel for a number of blends of OME 3–7 and diesel fuel .…”