2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06596-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Low-dimensional Wavelet Features and Support Vector Machine for Arrhythmia Beat Classification

Abstract: Automatic feature extraction and classification are two main tasks in abnormal ECG beat recognition. Feature extraction is an important prerequisite prior to classification since it provides the classifier with input features, and the performance of classifier depends significantly on the quality of these features. This study develops an effective method to extract low-dimensional ECG beat feature vectors. It employs wavelet multi-resolution analysis to extract time-frequency domain features and then applies p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have selected several ML methods to benchmark our model, and the result is compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score (see Tables 8 and 9) [34][35][36]. From Table 8, shallow architecture like SVM and DNNs produce a good performance, but from all results, a DNNs model with PCA and DWT produces high performance, such as accuracy of about 99.76%, precision of about 98.20%, sensitivity of about 91.80%, specificity of about 99.78% and an F1-measure of about 97.80%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have selected several ML methods to benchmark our model, and the result is compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score (see Tables 8 and 9) [34][35][36]. From Table 8, shallow architecture like SVM and DNNs produce a good performance, but from all results, a DNNs model with PCA and DWT produces high performance, such as accuracy of about 99.76%, precision of about 98.20%, sensitivity of about 91.80%, specificity of about 99.78% and an F1-measure of about 97.80%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weights of the classifier are extracted from the pre-trained DAEs-AEs model, and the fully connected layer is added as an output layer with Softmax as an activation function and categorical cross-entropy as a loss function. The classification performances were measured by using the following five metrics in the literature: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision and F1-score [22,30]. While accuracy can be used for evaluating the overall performance as benchmarking, the other metrics can measure the performance of a specific class of validation model.…”
Section: Pre-training and Fine-tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification phase based on ECG signal processing studies can be divided into two types of learning: supervised and unsupervised [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Such two types of learning provide good performance in ECG beats [26][27][28], or rhythm classification [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the higher the number of data, the more computational cost. Some of the features may be correlated, resulting in a large number of irrelevant variables, which will significantly affect computational efficiency due to the large redundant data [93]. Hence, it is vital to remove some correlated features while improving the accuracy and efficiency of classification.…”
Section: Dimensionality Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%