2006
DOI: 10.1080/01431160600554371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining fuzzy theory and a genetic algorithm for satellite image edge detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the matrix is enhanced to highlight the edge information. Finally, the processed membership matrix is inversely transformed into enhanced image and the edge is extracted [18]. There are some drawbacks involved in the Pal and King algorithm: (1) some gray information is lost after fuzzy-image enhancement because the range of the membership function is not strictly from 0 to 1; (2) the membership function depends on the reciprocal fuzzy factor F d and the exponential fuzzy factor F e ; however, these parameters are adjustable and there is no reasonable criterion to decide their optimal values for different images; (3) there is a lot of floating point arithmetic in the mapping of the membership matrix and the inverse transformation, which consumes much time and deteriorates a real-time property of the algorithm; and (4) the edge is enhanced via iterating many time moments, but when the times elapses, the details of the edge disappear.…”
Section: Edge Extraction For the Input Image Based On Modified Fuzzy mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the matrix is enhanced to highlight the edge information. Finally, the processed membership matrix is inversely transformed into enhanced image and the edge is extracted [18]. There are some drawbacks involved in the Pal and King algorithm: (1) some gray information is lost after fuzzy-image enhancement because the range of the membership function is not strictly from 0 to 1; (2) the membership function depends on the reciprocal fuzzy factor F d and the exponential fuzzy factor F e ; however, these parameters are adjustable and there is no reasonable criterion to decide their optimal values for different images; (3) there is a lot of floating point arithmetic in the mapping of the membership matrix and the inverse transformation, which consumes much time and deteriorates a real-time property of the algorithm; and (4) the edge is enhanced via iterating many time moments, but when the times elapses, the details of the edge disappear.…”
Section: Edge Extraction For the Input Image Based On Modified Fuzzy mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. JUBAI et.al [31] put forward a novel algorithm which integrates uncertainty principles of fuzzy with evolutionary concepts of genetic algorithms for detection of oil spilled on sea. Authors have tried to improve Palking fuzzy edge detection method with the help of genetic algorithms.…”
Section: B Fuzzy-genetic Edge Detection Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy logic and genetic programming (GP) were used to tackle the image de-noising problem of gray level images degraded with Gaussian white noise in spatial domain, by Chaudhry et al [10]. Jubai et al [32] combined an improved fuzzy theory and a GA for the detection of oil spilled on the sea by remote sensing. Ghosh et al developed an efficient data clustering scheme based on the property of aggregation pheromone found in ants in [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%