2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined use of isopropylamine and trifluoroacetic acid in methanol-containing mobile phases for chiral supercritical fluid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research group recently investigated the combined use of isopropylamine (IPA) and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in methanolcontaining mobile phases for the separation of basic, acidic, neutral and amphoteric pharmaceuticals on polysaccharide-based CSPs [88]. It was found that with a combination of IPA and TFA in the mobile phase different and broader enantioselectivities are obtained compared to the separate use of IPA for basic analytes or TFA for acidic analytes.…”
Section: Mobile Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our research group recently investigated the combined use of isopropylamine (IPA) and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in methanolcontaining mobile phases for the separation of basic, acidic, neutral and amphoteric pharmaceuticals on polysaccharide-based CSPs [88]. It was found that with a combination of IPA and TFA in the mobile phase different and broader enantioselectivities are obtained compared to the separate use of IPA for basic analytes or TFA for acidic analytes.…”
Section: Mobile Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of these two additives resulted in the separation of compounds that could not be resolved when only one additive was used (Fig. 5) [88,89].…”
Section: Mobile Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not observe the general effect of enhanced and decreased enantioselectivity on the cellulose-based and amylose-based CSPs, respectively, caused with the dual additives in the SFC separation systems that were reported by other authors. 28 It is obvious from Table 2 and Table S1 that different groups of tested analytes prefer different CSPs-polysaccharide backbone compared in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since methanol is the most polar of the alcohols which may offer strong enough eluent strength for the analytes, and considering that the sample is dissolved in methanol as well, we first selected methanol as the cosolvent. As referred to numerous previous studies on the enantioselective separation of basic molecules, either basic additives (ammonium hydroxide, dimethylamine) and/or acidic additives (formic acid, acetic acid, and TFA) were used to improve chiral separation efficiency and/or chromatographic peak shapes . Thus, under the same elution gradient, methanol, 0.05% NH 3 ·H 2 O in methanol, and 0.05% formic acid in methanol were evaluated as the cosolvent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%