2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined medroxyprogesterone acetate/levonorgestrel–intrauterine system treatment in young women with early-stage endometrial cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
53
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a recent review, 17 of 37 patients with stage IA (without myometrial invasion), grade 1 endometrial cancer achieved a complete response with a progestin-containing intrauterine device with a pooled complete response rate of 46% (95% confidence interval, 29%-63%) [78], which is a somewhat disappointing outcome. Hence, some investigators have reported the outcomes of a combined use of progestincontaining intrauterine device with oral progestin [18] or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist [17] for fertilitysparing therapy to achieve better outcomes than either agent alone. Kim et al [18] conducted a prospective observational study of 16 patients with stage IA (confined to endometrium), grade 1 endometrial cancer who were treated with progestincontaining intrauterine device with oral progestin.…”
Section: Oncologic Outcomes After Progestin Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to a recent review, 17 of 37 patients with stage IA (without myometrial invasion), grade 1 endometrial cancer achieved a complete response with a progestin-containing intrauterine device with a pooled complete response rate of 46% (95% confidence interval, 29%-63%) [78], which is a somewhat disappointing outcome. Hence, some investigators have reported the outcomes of a combined use of progestincontaining intrauterine device with oral progestin [18] or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist [17] for fertilitysparing therapy to achieve better outcomes than either agent alone. Kim et al [18] conducted a prospective observational study of 16 patients with stage IA (confined to endometrium), grade 1 endometrial cancer who were treated with progestincontaining intrauterine device with oral progestin.…”
Section: Oncologic Outcomes After Progestin Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, some investigators have reported the outcomes of a combined use of progestincontaining intrauterine device with oral progestin [18] or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist [17] for fertilitysparing therapy to achieve better outcomes than either agent alone. Kim et al [18] conducted a prospective observational study of 16 patients with stage IA (confined to endometrium), grade 1 endometrial cancer who were treated with progestincontaining intrauterine device with oral progestin. The results of that study were promising because 14 patients (87%) achieved complete response, and only 2 patients (14.3%) had recurrent disease [18].…”
Section: Oncologic Outcomes After Progestin Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Xu et al [8] indicated that high concentrations of LNG suppressed the proliferation of uterine leiomyoma cells and promoted cell apoptosis. Furthermore, preliminary clinical studies suggest the LNG-IUS as a means of reducing endometrial pathology associated with tamoxifen patients with endometrial carcinoma [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%