2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined H∞ and passivity state estimation of memristive neural networks with random gain fluctuations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding solvability conditions for the desired estimator gains are expressed in terms of the feasibility of a few linear matrix inequalities that can be solved using available software package. It should be pointed out that, compared to existing results in the literature such as [16], [23], the structure of the non-fragile estimator developed in this paper is of a simple linear form containing two constant gain matrices and is therefore convenient for practical implementation. Furthermore, the gain-dependent perturbations, which occur frequently in reality, are taken into account in terms of the multiplicative parameter variations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The corresponding solvability conditions for the desired estimator gains are expressed in terms of the feasibility of a few linear matrix inequalities that can be solved using available software package. It should be pointed out that, compared to existing results in the literature such as [16], [23], the structure of the non-fragile estimator developed in this paper is of a simple linear form containing two constant gain matrices and is therefore convenient for practical implementation. Furthermore, the gain-dependent perturbations, which occur frequently in reality, are taken into account in terms of the multiplicative parameter variations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the existing literature (e.g. [16], [23]), two typical assumptions are that the estimator gain variation is additive and the time-delays are exactly known due to their involvement in the estimator structure. These assumptions are, unfortunately, a bit restrictive in practice.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main reason why we classify the SOC estimation process into three cases is that during the end process of both charging and discharging, the weighed coefficients change more obviously than the average threshold values shown in Equation (19). Thus, the pack SOC can converge to SOC min (k) and SOC max (k) at a faster speed, compared to the calculation that considers only Case 1.…”
Section: Battery Pack State Of Charge Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%