2009
DOI: 10.1002/mats.200800101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Effects of Hot Curing Conditions and Reaction Heat on Rubber Vulcanization Efficiency and Vulcanizate Uniformity

Abstract: A mathematical model of the chemical kinetics of silicone rubber vulcanization is developed, with the thermal effects being computed using the increment method, and the hot vulcanization process estimated with the finite element method. The results show that the reaction heat of rubber vulcanization is important for energy saving, and that a proper curing medium temperature is important when considering both vulcanization efficiency and vulcanizate uniformity. The results also indicate that increases in the fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured temperatures, the experimentally determined concentration of cross-links (section ), and the explicit finite difference method solution results for HPAB/DCP compounds (compounds 1−3 in Table ) are presented in Figure (temperature) and Figure (concentration of cross-links). The methodology and the flow chart of the numerical simulation for integrated analysis is outlined in Figure analogously to Jia et al The agreement of the explicit finite difference method solution of DEB, DMBM, and DMBC with the experimental values was poorer for the concentration of cross-links in comparison to temperature (Figures and ), as in the first case a noticeable error occurs during the cross-linking process compound sampling. By comparison of the overall variance (statistical dispersion, calculated as the square of the summated differences between the model predictions and the experimental values) it was concluded, that the agreement was good regardless of the compound in question.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The measured temperatures, the experimentally determined concentration of cross-links (section ), and the explicit finite difference method solution results for HPAB/DCP compounds (compounds 1−3 in Table ) are presented in Figure (temperature) and Figure (concentration of cross-links). The methodology and the flow chart of the numerical simulation for integrated analysis is outlined in Figure analogously to Jia et al The agreement of the explicit finite difference method solution of DEB, DMBM, and DMBC with the experimental values was poorer for the concentration of cross-links in comparison to temperature (Figures and ), as in the first case a noticeable error occurs during the cross-linking process compound sampling. By comparison of the overall variance (statistical dispersion, calculated as the square of the summated differences between the model predictions and the experimental values) it was concluded, that the agreement was good regardless of the compound in question.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…BLOCK 1: for each node of the item (already discretized by means of FEMs) at fixed values of the input parameters T n (curing agent temperature) and t c (curing time), temperature profiles are evaluated by solving numerically a Fourier's heat transmission problem in two‐dimensions [45–51]. Since, closed form solutions are rarely available and usually refer to simple geometries, a FEM [52] discretization is needed in the most general case.…”
Section: The Kinetic Numerical Model: a Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first phase, elastomers are exposed to high temperatures in order to activate crosslinking and thus vulcanization, whereas in the second phase rubber is kept to ambient temperature through air and/or water. In the most general case of 2D items, temperature profiles for each point of the element are obtained solving numerically Fourier's heat equation law [45–51]: where ρ p , c pp, and λ p are EPDM density, specific heat capacity, and heat conductivity, respectively; Δ H r (kJ/mol) is rubber specific heat (enthalpy) of reaction and r p [mol/(m 3 sec)] is the rate of crosslinking.…”
Section: The Kinetic Numerical Model: a Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The governing equation of the temperature field can be derived by Galerkin method [16], as shown below…”
Section: Governing Equation Of Temperature Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%