2018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667179 View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
|

Abstract: Simultaneous application of the David and FET procedure in patients with acute aortic dissection is safe and feasible in experienced hands as compared with standard aortic root replacement plus FET. The mid-term outcomes are encouraging and noninferior to conventional surgery results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance
Select...
2
1
1
0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Goebel et al compared their outcomes of 28 patients who underwent combined VPARR and FET to 20 patients who underwent prosthetic aortic root replacement and FET, all for acute aortic dissection. 12 There was no significant difference between 30-day mortality (10.7% VPARR vs 20% root replacement) or midterm survival (82% VPARR vs 68% root replacement). They reported no need for intervention on the aortic root or the descending aorta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
See 3 more Smart Citations
Create an account to read the remaining citation statements from this report. You will also get access to:
  • Search over 1.2b+ citation statments to see what is being said about any topic in the research literature
  • Advanced Search to find publications that support or contrast your research
  • Citation reports and visualizations to easily see what publications are saying about each other
  • Browser extension to see Smart Citations wherever you read research
  • Dashboards to evaluate and keep track of groups of publications
  • Alerts to stay on top of citations as they happen
  • Automated reference checks to make sure you are citing reliable research in your manuscripts
  • 7 day free preview of our premium features.

Trusted by researchers and organizations around the world

Over 130,000 students researchers, and industry experts at use scite

See what students are saying

rupbmjkragerfmgwileyiopcupepmcmbcthiemesagefrontiersapsiucrarxivemeralduhksmucshluniversity-of-gavle
“…8 Goebel et al compared their outcomes of 28 patients who underwent combined VPARR and FET to 20 patients who underwent prosthetic aortic root replacement and FET, all for acute aortic dissection. 12 There was no significant difference between 30-day mortality (10.7% VPARR vs 20% root replacement) or midterm survival (82% VPARR vs 68% root replacement). They reported no need for intervention on the aortic root or the descending aorta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
“…They reported no need for intervention on the aortic root or the descending aorta. 12 Thoracic Aortic Repair: How Much Is Too Much?…”
Section: Combined Aortic Root and Arch Repairmentioning
See 2 more Smart Citations