2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2021.06.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Coronary CT-angiography And TAVI-planning For Ruling-out Significant Coronary Artery Disease: Added Value Of Machine-Learning Based CT-FFR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, its specificity and positive predictive value are somewhat limited, and its diagnostic accuracy decreases with increasing plaque burden as frequently encountered in elderly patients [ 29 ], including patients prior to TAVI. Though CT-FFR has been shown to increase specificity and diagnostic accuracy also in this patient group when applied for specific lesions [ 18 , 19 ], interpreting cCTA and deciding between obstructive and non-obstructive CAD in patients with higher plaque burden may be challenging and requires experience. Therefore, it would be most convenient if CT-FFR could not only guide the semiquantitative interpretation of cCTA [ 20 ] but rather render a discrete value indicative of hemodynamically relevant CAD, thus making the more subjective morphological interpretation unnecessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, its specificity and positive predictive value are somewhat limited, and its diagnostic accuracy decreases with increasing plaque burden as frequently encountered in elderly patients [ 29 ], including patients prior to TAVI. Though CT-FFR has been shown to increase specificity and diagnostic accuracy also in this patient group when applied for specific lesions [ 18 , 19 ], interpreting cCTA and deciding between obstructive and non-obstructive CAD in patients with higher plaque burden may be challenging and requires experience. Therefore, it would be most convenient if CT-FFR could not only guide the semiquantitative interpretation of cCTA [ 20 ] but rather render a discrete value indicative of hemodynamically relevant CAD, thus making the more subjective morphological interpretation unnecessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image quality was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively as previously described [ 8 , 18 ]. Quantitatively, image quality was described as contrast opacification in the aortic sinus in Hounsfield units (HU) and as contrast to noise ratio (CNR) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using invasive FFR as the reference standard, the AUC of CT-FFR in patients with severe aortic stenosis was 0.83, higher than CCTA and ICA. 115 Gohmann et al 81 showed that CT-FFR effectively excluded coronary heart disease in 44% (202/460) TAVR patients, thereby reducing ICA rates in older patients.…”
Section: Ct-ffr In Other Coronary-related Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic performance of CT-FFR on bifurcation, severe tortuosity, tandem lesions, extensive diffuse lesions, microvascular disease, ostial stenosis, and heavy calcification have also not been fully evaluated (Table 1). 18–20,23,24,26,28,29,53–58,66–89…”
Section: Indications Of Ct-ffrmentioning
confidence: 99%