Combination of problem-based learning with high-fidelity simulation in CPR training improves short and long-term CPR skills: a randomised single blinded trial

Abstract

Background Performance of sufficient cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by medical personnel is critical to improve outcomes during cardiac arrest. It has however been shown that even health care professionals possess a lack of knowledge and skills in CPR performance. The optimal method for teaching CPR remains unclear, and data that compares traditional CPR instructional methods with newer modalities of CPR instruction are needed. We therefore conducted a single blinded, randomised study involving medical students in order to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of a classical CPR education compared with a bilateral approach to CPR training, consisting of problem-based learning (PBL) plus high fidelity simulation. Methods One hundred twelve medical students were randomized during a curricular anaesthesiology course to a control ( n = 54) and an intervention ( n = 58) group. All participants were blinded to group assignment and partook in a 30-min-lecture on CPR basics. Subsequently, the control group participated in a 90-min tutor-guided CPR hands-on-training. The intervention group took part in a 45-min theoretical PBL module followed by 45 min of high fidelity simulated CPR training. The rate of participants recognizing clinical cardiac arrest followed by sufficiently performed CPR was the primary outcome parameter of this study. CPR performance was evaluated after the intervention. In addition, a follow-up evaluation was conducted after 6 months. Results 51.9% of the intervention group met the criteria of sufficiently performed CPR as compared to only 12.5% in the control group on the day of the intervention ( p = 0.007). Hands-off-time as a marker for CPR continuity was significantly less in the intervention group (24.0%) as compared to the control group (28.3%, p = 0.007, Hedges’ g = 1.55). At the six-month follow-up, hands-off-time was still significantly lower in the intervention group (23.7% vs. control group: 31.0%, p = 0.006, Hedges’ g = 1.88) but no significant difference in sufficiently performed CPR was detected (intervention group: 71.4% vs. control group: 54.5%, p = 0.55). Conclusion PBL combined with high fidelity simulation training leads to a measurable short-term increase in initiating sufficient CPR by medical students immediately after training as compared to classical education. At six month post instruction, these differences remained only partially. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1626-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Testing a diabetes keotacidosis simulation in critical care nursing: A randomized control trial

“…Students reported better knowledge through the highfidelity simulation teaching intervention compared to traditional clinical settings over time. Students in the HFS intervention group had better performance and had increased knowledge and performance 10,11 compared to the control group. These differences showed that the HFS-DKA had contributed to improving knowledge and critical thinking in the simulation group.…”

Desenvolvimento de protótipo de reanimação cardiopulmonar para educação em saúde [Development of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation prototype for health education] [Desarrollo de un prototipo de reanimación cardiopulmonar para la educación en salud]

“…Após a criação de um manequim infantil para treinamento em SBV, notou-se melhoria significativa no atendimento inicial à vítima, proporção correta de compressões torácicas e profundidade, frequência respiratória adequada e acionamento de suporte médico em tempo hábil. Essa intervenção de baixo custo apresentou potencial para ampla aplicação em países desenvolvidos e em desenvolvimento [16][17][18] .…”

Clinical simulation for nursing competence development in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: systematic review

“…to <15, moderate quality; and ≥15, high quality (21) . (13) *CINAHL = Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; † LILACS = Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences; ‡ CPR = Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Figure 1 -Flowchart of the identification, selection and inclusion process of studies adapted from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA).…”