The objective was to assess and critique how sequential disease modifying therapies (DMARDs) have been modelled in the context of economic evaluations of the use of DMARDs for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). A secondary aim was to identify the methodological challenges of modelling sequential therapies.Systematic searches of 10 databases were undertaken in February 2013. Studies were included if they were English language and reported a full comparative economic evaluation, and they were appraised using the Drummond checklist. Data extracted included economic evaluation data, data relating to sequential treatments, and data on the modelling methods used. 57 studies were identified, with 25 (44%) modelling a sequence of treatments. 43 (75%) were cost-utility analyses. 11 (19%) were UK, and 11 (19%) were US. The remainder were mainly European (26 (46%) studies).There was a distinction between studies in recent-onset RA (14 (25%)), and those in established RA (42 (74%)).One study (1%) was unclear. Individual level models were more likely to meet the Drummond criteria and evaluate sequences. No study identified an optimal sequence of multiple treatments given a set of alternative treatments. The level of reporting about the methods and evidence used to assess the impact of future treatments was generally poor. Where models considered a lifelong time horizon and downstream treatment sequences, evidence gaps were identified.The review identified that methods have not been consistently applied, leading to varied estimates of costeffectiveness. Treatment sequences have not been fully considered and modelled, potentially producing inaccurate estimates of cost-effectiveness.