2019
DOI: 10.3390/nano9091291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colorimetric Determination of the Activity of Starch-Debranching Enzyme via Modified Tollens’ Reaction

Abstract: Nelson–Somogyi and 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assays are the classical analytical methods for the determination of activity of starch-debranching enzymes, however, they have a narrow detection range and do not adapt to the quantitative measurement of linear polysaccharides. Herein, we developed a simple and accurate colorimetric assay for determining the activity of starch-debranching pullulanase through the modified Tollens’ reaction in combination with UV irradiation. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) were f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,17 Therefore, eliminating α-1,6 branches by debranching enzymes (DBEs) during starch degradation is a critical and well-established approach to facilitate starch hydrolysis and improve production efficiency. 18 DBEs are a type of starch-degrading enzyme that can specifically act on α-1,6-linkages in glycogen, amylopectin, and related polysaccharides. They can be classified into different groups according to the differences in substrate specificity and catalytic mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16,17 Therefore, eliminating α-1,6 branches by debranching enzymes (DBEs) during starch degradation is a critical and well-established approach to facilitate starch hydrolysis and improve production efficiency. 18 DBEs are a type of starch-degrading enzyme that can specifically act on α-1,6-linkages in glycogen, amylopectin, and related polysaccharides. They can be classified into different groups according to the differences in substrate specificity and catalytic mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, starch can be also applied to produce cyclodextrin and oligosaccharides through the action of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.19) and maltooligosaccharide-forming amylases (EC 3.2.1.-), respectively. Although various amylolytic enzymes have been used in starch processing, most of them are very expensive or inefficient in starch conversion . The majority of α-amylase, β-amylase, and α-glucosidase enzymes can hydrolyze α-1,4-glucosidic linkages in starch but have low activities for α-1,6-linkages, , resulting in a low overall conversion rate of starch material and large amounts of byproducts. , Therefore, eliminating α-1,6 branches by debranching enzymes (DBEs) during starch degradation is a critical and well-established approach to facilitate starch hydrolysis and improve production efficiency …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time was 10.80 min. The total protein content was determined by the Kjeldahl nitrogen determination method, 11 and starch and reductive sugar contents were determined using 3,5‐dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) 12 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total protein content was determined by the Kjeldahl nitrogen determination method, 11 and starch and reductive sugar contents were determined using 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS). 12 Determination of enzyme activity All samples were freeze-dried completely. Their liquefaction and saccharification capacity was analyzed and optimized following methods reported previously.…”
Section: Analysis Of Basic Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMBs were prepared by the self-assembly of short-chain glucans (SCGs) together with iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) into a spherical form, as reported by Luo et al Briefly, iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) were prepared by coprecipitation of ferrous and ferric salts in a 2:1 molar ratio (80 and 40 mM, respectively) in 20 mL of deionized water (DW) containing 150 mg of dextran. The mixture was sonicated by a Q500 Sonicator (VC 750, Sonics & Materials Inc., Newtown, CT) in an ice bath for 3 min with an on/off cycle of 3/3 s at 30% amplitude through a 6 mm probe.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%