Color Removal of Pulp and Paper Mill Wastewater Using Residual Eucalyptus Wood

Yupin, Kanjana; Neamhom, Thanakrit; Singhkant, Chatchawal; Sreesai, Siranee; Polprasert, Supawadee

doi:10.32526/ennrj/20/202200038

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…94 An experiment using activated carbon derived from residual eucalyptus wood as an adsorbent for the removal of color from P&P mill wastewater demonstrated that, despite the high surface area of the adsorbent, the cost of 7 g of adsorbent to treat the wastewater was not competitive enough. 95 As another inexpensive and environmentally friendly adsorbent, activated carbon can be produced by pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste, and its application to waste plastic management and wastewater treatment may solve both problems simultaneously. Based on the optimization, 1.25 g of adsorbent dose, pH of 8, contact time of 7 h, agitation speed of 184 rpm, and temperature of 40 °C, 98.46% of color and 94.25% of lignin were eliminated.…”

Section: Reverse Osmosis (Ro)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comprehensive Review on Pulp and Paper Industries Wastewater Treatment Advances

Esmaeeli,

Sarrafzadeh,

Zeighami

et al. 2023

Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The pulp and paper industry generates vast amounts of wastewater, and its character heavily depends on various factors (raw material, the undertaken process, the final product, etc.). The wastewater from this sector, which originates from several sources in each mill and are mostly combined, is polluting and hazardous. This paper presents a state-of-the-art review of the physical, chemical, biological, and advanced hybrid treatment techniques, concerning their effectiveness in removing specific pollutants, namely, chemical oxygen demand, lignin, color, and adsorbable organo-halogens. Throughout the manuscript, at the end of each section, a conclusive comparison has been presented and the proper method is introduced. Furthermore, numeric data regarding the effectiveness of each technique toward each pollutant are gathered from the literature and are available in the Supporting Information of the paper. Biological treatment processes using anaerobic–aerobic treatment mostly cure organic biodegradable contaminants (75–90% COD removal). Moreover, biological treatment using a consortium of microorganisms can potentially increase color removal efficiency (from 65 to 97%). Hybrid treatment is also among the candidates for color removal. To treat complex matters (lignin and AOX), physical and chemical treatments have shown promising performance, but they are generally expensive and impractical to treat huge amounts of wastewater. For the treatment of high molecular weight contaminants (lignin) advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), including ozonation and Fenton-based treatment, have shown great performance (90–99%); however, they are limited due to their maintenance and operation costs. To overcome these challenges, source separation of the wastewater streams in the pulp and paper industry is recommended. AOPs or membrane technologies or hybrid processes are suggested for the bleaching effluent (80% AOX removal), which is relatively low in amount, and a combination of conventional treatment processes would be preferred to treat wastewater streams that are more biodegradable. The biological performance can also be enhanced using granular activated carbon on the sequence. Finally, for treating black liquor, adsorption processes have proven to be the prime candidate.

show abstract

Section: Reverse Osmosis (Ro)mentioning

confidence: 99%