Robotics: Science and Systems XVI 2020
DOI: 10.15607/rss.2020.xvi.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision Probabilities for Continuous-Time Systems Without Sampling

Abstract: Demand for high-performance, robust, and safe autonomous systems has grown substantially in recent years. These objectives motivate the desire for efficient risk estimation that can be embedded in core decision-making tasks such as motion planning. On one hand, Monte-Carlo (MC) and other samplingbased techniques provide accurate solutions for a wide variety of motion models but are cumbersome in the context of continuous optimization. On the other hand, "direct" approximations aim to compute (or upper-bound) t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common formulation enforces pointwise chance constraints that ensure the independent satisfaction of each constraint at each time step with high probability (Castillo-Lopez et al, 2019;Lew et al, 2020;Hewing et al, 2020;Polymenakos et al, 2020;Khojasteh et al, 2020;Jasour et al, 2021). In contrast, joint chance constraints guarantee trajectory-wise constraints satisfaction with high probability (Blackmore et al, 2011;Frey et al, 2020;Schmerling and Pavone, 2017;Koller et al, 2018;Lew et al, 2022) which is of particular interest whenever all constraints should be satisfied at all times jointly. For instance, a drone transporting a package should always avoid obstacles and reach its destination with high probability over the distribution of possible payloads.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common formulation enforces pointwise chance constraints that ensure the independent satisfaction of each constraint at each time step with high probability (Castillo-Lopez et al, 2019;Lew et al, 2020;Hewing et al, 2020;Polymenakos et al, 2020;Khojasteh et al, 2020;Jasour et al, 2021). In contrast, joint chance constraints guarantee trajectory-wise constraints satisfaction with high probability (Blackmore et al, 2011;Frey et al, 2020;Schmerling and Pavone, 2017;Koller et al, 2018;Lew et al, 2022) which is of particular interest whenever all constraints should be satisfied at all times jointly. For instance, a drone transporting a package should always avoid obstacles and reach its destination with high probability over the distribution of possible payloads.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], a Gaussian Process (GP) based technique is employed to learn motion patterns (a mapping from states to trajectory derivatives) to predict possible future obstacles trajectories. First-exist times for Brownian motions are extended to continuous nonlinear dynamics to compute collision probabilities in [20]. Axelrod et al [4] focus exclusively on obstacle uncertainty and formalize a notion of shadows, which are the geometric equivalent of confidence intervals for uncertain obstacles.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future obstacle trajectories are predicted using a Gaussian Process (GP) based technique that learns the mapping from states to trajectory derivatives in [1]. In [11] the first-exist times for Brownian motions are leveraged to compute collision probabilities. [2] focus exclusively on environment uncertainty and formalize a notion of shadows, a geometric equivalent of confidence intervals for uncertain obstacles.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%