1930
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0100058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collection and Analysis of Chicken Urine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1938
1938
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trial lasted 14 d, with collection of excreta the last 3 d. A correction for nitrogen retention decreased the ME of the test ingredient by 8.22 kcal/g of nitrogen retained. The value of 8.22 is the energy value of uric acid per gram of nitrogen (Coulson and Hughes, 1930). The ME values that were determined with this procedure were more repeatable than those determined as productive energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The trial lasted 14 d, with collection of excreta the last 3 d. A correction for nitrogen retention decreased the ME of the test ingredient by 8.22 kcal/g of nitrogen retained. The value of 8.22 is the energy value of uric acid per gram of nitrogen (Coulson and Hughes, 1930). The ME values that were determined with this procedure were more repeatable than those determined as productive energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The first was the 'cage method' whereby the animals were continuously observed and urine samples were collected by sucking up the urine part of the excreta from the trays at the bottom of the cage, within two minutes after excretion. The second method was the 'cloacal cannula method' (Halsema et al, 1987), a modification of the technique of Coulson and Hughes (1930).…”
Section: Design Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigations have simply attached devices (no surgical intervention) [87] to birds or surgically exteriorized the urethral opening [88,89,90]to facilitate separate collection of faeces and urine. However, colostomy provides a better way for quantitative separation and collection of the faeces and urine from chickens and other birds [91,92,93] …”
Section: Collection Of Urine and Faecesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently an apparatus that can be adapted for separate collection of faeces and urine from cattle, sheep, goats and swine has been used with excellent success [85]. Catheterization of the urinary bladder of large female cattle, sheep, goats and swine [86,87,88] provides for quantitative collection of urine and prevents cross contamination of faeces and urine. Catheterization of the urinary bladder of small animals such as the rat is not feasible; however, through surgical intervention the ureter and the urinary bladder can be cannulated to facilitate urine collection [86].…”
Section: Collection Of Urine and Faecesmentioning
confidence: 99%