2005
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmi073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collecting genetic information in primary care: evaluating a new family history tool

Abstract: The FHQ identified most informants with genetic risks that are appropriately addressed in primary care-those with a family history of premature coronary heart disease, those warranting specialist referral, and those who might appropriately be offered carrier testing. However, it was less effective in identifying those with a possible Mendelian disorder for whom more information was required.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
97
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2,25 Pedigrees have the advantage of standardized nomenclature and structure, but their use might not be feasible for many primary care prac-tices, 26 and some clinicians might not feel capable of creating or accurately interpreting a pedigree. 27,28 As one approach, genetic counselors often start the history collection over the telephone, before the initial appointment, so that they and the families can begin the research needed for a complete pedigree.…”
Section: Current Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,25 Pedigrees have the advantage of standardized nomenclature and structure, but their use might not be feasible for many primary care prac-tices, 26 and some clinicians might not feel capable of creating or accurately interpreting a pedigree. 27,28 As one approach, genetic counselors often start the history collection over the telephone, before the initial appointment, so that they and the families can begin the research needed for a complete pedigree.…”
Section: Current Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 75 different FHH tools have been created for public use (Wang et al 2011), but few have been evaluated for use in clinical (Wang et al 2011;Reid et al 2009) or population-based settings (Petruccio et al 2008). Most FHH tools are based on a biomedical paradigm, focusing only on the collection of information about disease diagnoses of relatives (Qureshi et al 2005;Feero et al 2008). The U.S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…61 Subsequently, a host of governmental, not-for-profit and commercial entities have promulgated free, web-based family history tools ( Table 1). Only a few of these instruments are being examined prospectively for accuracy [66][67][68] or utility. 60 The My Family Health Portrait tool, developed through the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, performed as well as a detailed history obtained by a genetic counselor for four common diseases and less well for two others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%