2003
DOI: 10.2190/y3xn-rw1a-7ewt-kxtc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Older adults' preferred partners for collaborative everyday problem solving and the types of everyday problems solved alone and with others were examined in a sample of community dwelling older adults (N = 112, M age = 71.86 yrs., SD = 5.92 yrs.). Family members (i.e., spouses, adult children) were the most frequently nominated partners for collaborative everyday problem solving, but friends, neighbors, and church members also were nominated. Older adults reported that they solved numerous types of problems, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But much of that work has been on simple tasks such as puzzle problems or brainstorming (e.g., Hill, 1982). For complex CPS, more of the work has been theoretical, as a means of scaling up to real-world problems with a greater number of problem solvers, although there has been some empirical work (e.g., de Montjoye, Stopczynski, Shmueli, Pentland, & Lehmann, 2014;Fiore, Wiltshire, Oglesby, O'Keefe, & Salas, 2014;Strough, Patrick, Swenson, Cheng, & Barnes, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But much of that work has been on simple tasks such as puzzle problems or brainstorming (e.g., Hill, 1982). For complex CPS, more of the work has been theoretical, as a means of scaling up to real-world problems with a greater number of problem solvers, although there has been some empirical work (e.g., de Montjoye, Stopczynski, Shmueli, Pentland, & Lehmann, 2014;Fiore, Wiltshire, Oglesby, O'Keefe, & Salas, 2014;Strough, Patrick, Swenson, Cheng, & Barnes, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, there are differences in medical scenarios, participants' identity, data formats, and other variables between the two studies. There are few studies that have examined the impact of the type of decision-making (collaborative or individual) upon the framing effect bias, especially in older participants, as older adults or patients often turn to relatives or friends for discussion and suggestion when they make decisions regarding treatment options (Strough, Patrick, Swenson, Cheng, & Barnes, 2003). It is very difficult for older people to make final decisions depending only upon themselves.…”
Section: Collective Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is more, Margrett and Marsiske (2002) could demonstrate that people working with their spouse rated their expectations of satisfaction with collaborative teamwork more positively than the participants who were assigned to work with a stranger. In fact, self and partner-rated expectations of competitiveness were predictive of collaborative performance on tasks of planning, decision-making, and comprehension (Strough, Patrick, Swenson, Cheng, & Barnes, 2003).…”
Section: Interdyadic Differences In Decision-making: Explanatory Concmentioning
confidence: 95%