Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems

Further policy changes are needed to improve depression care

“…Commonly reported triggers include chewing, breathing and sounds emitted from movements (e.g., foot or pen tapping) [2,3]. Those with misophonic symptoms often experience significant impairment across occupational/academic, familial/home-based and social functioning in response to the disgust, anger and distress caused by auditory cues [3].…”

“…Those with misophonic symptoms often experience significant impairment across occupational/academic, familial/home-based and social functioning in response to the disgust, anger and distress caused by auditory cues [3]. The primary behavioral response to triggers is avoidance, although other behaviors have been reported [2,4].…”

“…Collaborative care for depression is an evidence-based solution to gaps in quality of mental health care that achieves the triple aim of improving quality of care and outcomes, without increasing costs of care for individuals with depression, based on 79 randomized clinical trials [2]. Rarely is there such extensive evidence that so clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of a treatment model.…”

Reducing severity of comorbid psychiatric symptoms in an epilepsy clinic using a colocation model: Results of a pilot intervention

“…Collaborative care models consist of team-oriented, multidisciplinary interventions to deliver care by systematically improving care coordination via organizational leadership support, evidence-based provider decision-making, and clinical information systems [17]. Collaborative care models have been associated with significant improvement in both depression and anxiety outcomes compared with usual care [18].…”

L'assistenza integrata della depressione in medicina generale: una rassegna delle revisioni sistematiche sulla sua efficacia

“…Sei revisioni sono state escluse. La ragione della esclusione è stata: revisioni narrative: 2 articoli (Adli et al, 2006, Barbui & Tansella, 2006; protocollo di revisione: 1 articolo (Fletcher et al, 2007); editoriale: 1 articolo (Katon & Unutzer, 2006); obiettivo della revisione non pertinente: 2 articoli (Gilbody et al, 2003;Craven & Bland, 2006) Revisioni incluse…”