2016
DOI: 10.1177/1746847715623691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaboration without Representation: Labor Issues in Motion and Performance Capture

Abstract: Classical film theory topics, such as the divide between live action and animation, the definition of cinematic performance, and the configuration and impact of the star system continue to shapewhile also being reshaped by -discourse on animation labor in the digital age. Focusing on motion capture in contemporary Hollywood, the first part of this article historicizes and examines the diminishment of the animators' contribution to this filmmaking process in promotional materials and public discussions, and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Mihaela Mihailova, this archive-informed style of production should raise "concerns about the gendering of digital labour along familiar patriarchal power structures," such that, "as novel and exciting as creative possibilities opened up by digital technologies may be, they continue to be shaped by sexism and capitalist exploitation." 7 With this in mind, the co-opted voices of Audrey Hepburn, Shirley MacLaine, Kim Novak, and even the racialised Alec Guinness, as Prince Feisal in Lawrence of Arabia (Lean, 1962), echo across the robots' repetitions as a gendered, racialised, and capitalist appropriations. This narrow archive also communicates compulsory heterosexuality, transposing sexist film grammars, including the male gaze and objectifying fragmentation of female-presenting bodies, into the imagined future.…”
Section: Uploading the Archive Copy/pasting The "Classical"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Mihaela Mihailova, this archive-informed style of production should raise "concerns about the gendering of digital labour along familiar patriarchal power structures," such that, "as novel and exciting as creative possibilities opened up by digital technologies may be, they continue to be shaped by sexism and capitalist exploitation." 7 With this in mind, the co-opted voices of Audrey Hepburn, Shirley MacLaine, Kim Novak, and even the racialised Alec Guinness, as Prince Feisal in Lawrence of Arabia (Lean, 1962), echo across the robots' repetitions as a gendered, racialised, and capitalist appropriations. This narrow archive also communicates compulsory heterosexuality, transposing sexist film grammars, including the male gaze and objectifying fragmentation of female-presenting bodies, into the imagined future.…”
Section: Uploading the Archive Copy/pasting The "Classical"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, these descriptions give little thought to the intervention of anything or anyone other than the performers. As Mihaela Mihailova (2016: 43) summarizes, then, motion capture has often been grossly oversimplified, to the point of presenting it as a ‘technological miracle capable of directly translating an actor’s performance into a digital creature, as if by magic’.…”
Section: Motion Capture: a Harbinger Of The Virtual Cinema To Comementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear animation might seem to be furthering the trend of obfuscating the work of animation workers (especially international ones) behind seemingly automated technologies, much the way depictions of performance capture elide the work of animators. 19 Focusing on the technical work integrated into production helps to reveal this labor though. Indeed, it may even help reveal some of the labor obfuscated by performance capture.…”
Section: Physical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%