2021
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohort Profile: The 1978–79 Ribeirao Preto (Brazil) birth cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the fifth phase, whose data collection occurred between 2016 and 2017, 1775 participants were evaluated. Details on the eligible individuals who were recruited and evaluated at each stage of this cohort are available in other publications [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fifth phase, whose data collection occurred between 2016 and 2017, 1775 participants were evaluated. Details on the eligible individuals who were recruited and evaluated at each stage of this cohort are available in other publications [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This number corresponded to 98% of live births that occurred in the eight maternity hospitals in Ribeirão Preto between 1 June 1978 and 31 May 1979. Of these respondents, 2094 were excluded because they were not residents in the city at the time of delivery [ 23 ]. A total of 6973 newborns remained in the study; of these, 6827 were single fetuses, and 146 were twins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, 2103 participants were reassessed. Forty twins were excluded, leaving 2063 individuals [ 23 ]. For this study, 29 participants were also excluded because they had no data on the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), 141 because they did not undergo the bronchoprovocation test, 20 that presented forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) ≤ 65% and 16 because they reported energy intake outside the mean ± 3 standard deviations, considered implausible [ 24 ], totaling 1857 individuals in the final sample ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation