2018 International Conference on Radar (RADAR) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2018.8557223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent Change Detection Under a Forest Canopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the values of the covariance matrices are generally unknown, and thus, in practice, sub-optimal tests are implemented where the unknown parameters are measured directly through the data with their maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) to form a generalized likelihood test (e.g., see [71]). Due to the complexity of these optimal tests and the need to estimate the mentioned model parameters, several approximate unsupervised/supervised CD approaches have been proposed in the literature (among others, see [14,45,[89][90][91][92][93][94]). Overall, they can be distinguished in the two general categories of the methods based exclusively on the analysis of the amplitude of SAR backscattered returns (incoherent approaches) and those that also consider the phase of the radar backscattered signals (coherent strategies).…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Coherent and Incoherent Change Detection Met...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, the values of the covariance matrices are generally unknown, and thus, in practice, sub-optimal tests are implemented where the unknown parameters are measured directly through the data with their maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) to form a generalized likelihood test (e.g., see [71]). Due to the complexity of these optimal tests and the need to estimate the mentioned model parameters, several approximate unsupervised/supervised CD approaches have been proposed in the literature (among others, see [14,45,[89][90][91][92][93][94]). Overall, they can be distinguished in the two general categories of the methods based exclusively on the analysis of the amplitude of SAR backscattered returns (incoherent approaches) and those that also consider the phase of the radar backscattered signals (coherent strategies).…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Coherent and Incoherent Change Detection Met...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This circumstance can be explained by the fact that SAR images are corrupted by the presence of speckle noise [32][33][34]. Despite its complexity, SAR images in change detection [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] were attractive from the operational viewpoint since SAR sensors are active instruments operating in any atmospheric and sunlight conditions. This means that they can monitor geographical areas recurrently, even while covered by clouds and during periods when solar illumination is severely limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is explained by the fact that the phase information acquired by the SAR system is very sensitive to subtle changes. Generally, the change of half of the wavelength level is large enough to cause complete decorrelation [ 18 ]. Considering the influence of noise and other factors, CCD can at least detect changes in the wavelength scale, which means that the CCD method plays an important role in detecting human activities and other small changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim is to extend the CCD technique to detect disturbances of the ground in a forest. We first proposed the idea of using low frequency 3D SAR beamforming in [6] and presented further detail at the 2018 conference on radar [7]. In this work, we provide a more comprehensive analysis of the proposed solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the signal model and scene model are discussed in greater detail. To provide a complete, self‐contained analysis, elements in [7] are included and expanded as needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%