2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-s2-p14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive outcome of classic infantile Pompe patients receiving enzyme therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Griffiths Scales is in essence a ‘child‐friendly’ developmental measure, based on the skill and value of observing children, and is playful in nature. It is these attributes that are likely to have rendered it the choice of developmental assessment for children, especially those with clinical diagnoses who are threatened by a formal, rigid testing situation (Ebbink et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Griffiths Scales is in essence a ‘child‐friendly’ developmental measure, based on the skill and value of observing children, and is playful in nature. It is these attributes that are likely to have rendered it the choice of developmental assessment for children, especially those with clinical diagnoses who are threatened by a formal, rigid testing situation (Ebbink et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there has been an extensive The GMDS-ER has been translated into Italian, French, Portuguese, Chinese and Russian since its publication in English in 2006. Research studies since 2010 confirm the use of the Griffiths Scales in assessing children in special populations such as HIVexposed or infected children (Lowick, Sawry, & Meyers, 2012;Perez et al, 2015;Springer, Laughton, Tomlinson, Harvey, & Esser, 2012), aboriginal infants (McDonald, Comino, Knight, & Webster, 2012;McDonald, Webster, Knight, & Comino, 2014), measuring the effects of various surgical procedures or noxious environments or treatments (Battaglia et al, 2012;Ebbink, Aarsen, Van Gelder, & Van Den Hout, 2013;Hemels et al, 2012;Laughton et al, 2012;Ostrea et al, 2012;Rahkonen et al, 2012;Van Der Aa et al, 2013;Peroni et al, 2014;Van Dyk, Ramanjam, Church, Koren, & Donald, 2014), genetic groups such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (Bargagna, Bozza, Purpura, & Luongo, 2012;Colombo et al, 2014;Chieffo et al, 2015;Pane et al, 2012Pane et al, , 2013 and multiple births (Tsekoura, Beli, Boutopoulou, & Orfanidou, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%