2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive-attentional syndrome – The psychometric properties of the CAS-1 and multi-measure CAS-based clinical diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the first stage participants, two extreme groups were selected. As the results of previous studies (Kowalski and Dragan, 2019) have suggested that combining different measures of aspects of CAS is best for predicting levels of psychopathology, several measures were used in forming the two groups. The cut-off criterion was a score above the 66th percentile or below the 33rd percentile of the sum of results on the following measures: the CAS-1 questionnaire, the Brooding subscale of the RRS (as this aspect of rumination is most robustly associated with depressive and anxiety disorders, cf.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the first stage participants, two extreme groups were selected. As the results of previous studies (Kowalski and Dragan, 2019) have suggested that combining different measures of aspects of CAS is best for predicting levels of psychopathology, several measures were used in forming the two groups. The cut-off criterion was a score above the 66th percentile or below the 33rd percentile of the sum of results on the following measures: the CAS-1 questionnaire, the Brooding subscale of the RRS (as this aspect of rumination is most robustly associated with depressive and anxiety disorders, cf.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group demographic characteristics are presented in Table 1. These groups were also clinically diagnosed with a SCID-I interview but full results are presented elsewhere (Kowalski and Dragan, 2019; Dragan and Kowalski, unpublished). A total of 45% of participants from the HCAS group and none from LCAS group met the diagnostic criteria for a current diagnosis of a psychological disorder.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measure has undergone psychometric evaluation in adult non-clinical and clinical samples. In non-clinical samples, the CAS-1 has demonstrated good internal consistency, stability and convergent, predictive, incremental and discriminative validity (Fergus et al, 2012;Kowalski and Dragan, 2019;Nordahl and Wells, 2019). With regard to the factor structure of the instrument, one study found that a twofactor model was the best solution (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the factor structure of the instrument, one study found that a twofactor model was the best solution (i.e. strategies and beliefs; Kowalski and Dragan, 2019), while another study found support for a three-factor solution (i.e. strategies, positive beliefs, negative beliefs; Nordahl and Wells, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%