1991
DOI: 10.1002/1098-108x(199105)10:3<313::aid-eat2260100307>3.0.co;2-0
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Cognitive aspects of dietary restraint: Effects on person memory

Abstract: Memory for weight‐, food‐, and appearance‐related information was examined in female restrained and unrestrained college students and in female obese and eating‐disordered patients. Subjects read an essay about another person and were later asked to recall the essay as completely as possible. As predicted, restrained students remembered more weight‐ and food‐related items than appearance‐related items in comparison to the unrestrained students. Similarly, the obese and anorexic patients recalled significantly … Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
42
6
4
1

Citation Types

1
40
1
0

Year Published

Range
1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
42
3
3

Relationship

3
45

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 48 publications

(42 citation statements)
references

References 24 publications

1
40
1
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The results are in line with the only study to date on memory biases in an adult overweight population. In this study, overweight women recalled significantly more weight-and food-related items than other items after reading an essay (King et al, 1991) but no firm conclusions could be drawn about whether the memory bias was specific for food words (Lee & Shafran, 2004). In the present study, the latter shortcoming was partially met by including only high caloric food words as target words.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Although research in normal weight participants is inconclusive (Sebastian et al , 1996), a study by Israeli and Stewart (2001) did find partial support for greater memory accessibility to high caloric food cues in restrained eaters. King and colleagues (1991), in turn, found a memory bias for food and weight stimuli in restrained eaters, irrespective of their weight status. A possible explanation for the lack of evidence in the present study is that the dietary restraint and disinhibition scales of the DEBQ, as used here, measure attitudes and not actual behaviour.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation