2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive and functional connectivity impairment in post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(86 reference statements)
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cognitive results indicate that 71% of participants had changes in cognitive screening, a finding that is consistent with other reports in which the same screening tool was used [9], [10] a tool that was used as the main mechanism of evaluation in initial studies on Long COVID and cognition. The most impaired cognitive function was visual memory, with a total of 69% of participants showing at least mild changes, followed by language with 54%, visuospatial abilities with 49% [11], [12], verbal episodic memory with 37% [13], executive functions with 34%, consistent with other findings [10], [12], [14]- [18], and 34% showing dysfunction in attention. In terms of premorbid intelligence, only 12% of participants had changes, meaning that 88% of participants had preserved cognitive abilities before Long COVID symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The cognitive results indicate that 71% of participants had changes in cognitive screening, a finding that is consistent with other reports in which the same screening tool was used [9], [10] a tool that was used as the main mechanism of evaluation in initial studies on Long COVID and cognition. The most impaired cognitive function was visual memory, with a total of 69% of participants showing at least mild changes, followed by language with 54%, visuospatial abilities with 49% [11], [12], verbal episodic memory with 37% [13], executive functions with 34%, consistent with other findings [10], [12], [14]- [18], and 34% showing dysfunction in attention. In terms of premorbid intelligence, only 12% of participants had changes, meaning that 88% of participants had preserved cognitive abilities before Long COVID symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Most studies investigating functional brain activity in patients recovered from COVID-19 have been conducted using resting-state methods. Alterations in signal properties and functional connectivity have been found in COVID-19 patients, 55,56 and have been associated with hospitalization, 57 and persistent symptoms such as headaches, 58 persistent olfactory dysfunction 48,59,60 and other behavioral markers such as working memory performance, 61,62 anxiety, 63 psychotic-like experiences in adolescents, 64 and post-traumatic stress symptoms. 65 Also, some studies found no functional alteration in recovered COVID-19 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 However, research has failed to find a specific marker of neuroinflammation, 67 or structural alterations were not found in other samples. 48,62 As with functional alterations, the severity of the acute episode and the presence of persistent symptoms are more closely related to structural alterations, primarily in white matter integrity. 66,68…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in ammatory milieu can lead to changes in mucus volume and composition, rendering it challenging for odorants to effectively bind to olfactory receptors, thereby impairing the sense of smell [47]. Additionally, olfactory defects in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 have been associated with morphological changes observed in the olfactory bulbs and cortex, indicating potential neurodegenerative processes taking place [38,39]. However, the causality and the temporal relationship between these changes and peripheral inputs due to epithelial damage warrant further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the pathophysiology underpinning olfactory dysfunctions in PASC patients remains to be fully elucidated. In some cases, damage may manifest independently or simultaneously at different levels of the olfactory pathway, from the sensory epithelium in the olfactory fossa to the olfactory bulbs and cerebral cortex [37][38][39]. A possible explanation lies in the persistent nasal in ammatory microenvironment following the primary SARS-CoV-2 infection [31,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%