2014
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Coenzyme Q10 for heart failure
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
85
8
5
4
Citation Types
4
63
0
4
Year Published
Range
2014
20142025
2025Publication Types
Select...
89
6
2
Relationship
0
97
Authors
Journals
Cited by 97 publications
(71 citation statements)
References 89 publications
4
63
0
4
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Meanwhile, coenzyme Q10 did not significantly improve the NYHA cardiac function in patients with heart failure, which is consistent with the results of a previous examination [29]. In this study, we found that coenzyme Q10 can improve exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure; however, in the investigation conducted by Madmani [30], this improvement was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Meanwhile, coenzyme Q10 did not significantly improve the NYHA cardiac function in patients with heart failure, which is consistent with the results of a previous examination [29]. In this study, we found that coenzyme Q10 can improve exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure; however, in the investigation conducted by Madmani [30], this improvement was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The primary outcome, ejection fraction, showed a notable increase, indicating an enhancement in systolic performance. This finding aligns with previous studies suggesting that CoQ10 plays a crucial role in improving cardiac function by enhancing mitochondrial energy production and reducing oxidative stress [3,4,7,8,15].…”
Section: Principal Findings
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Both fixed-effect and random-effects models provided similar effect sizes and confidence intervals, reinforcing the consistency of the results [3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 15].…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results, as excluding high-risk studies and using alternative statistical models did not significantly alter the outcomes [3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 15]. Publication bias was assessed and found to be low, further supporting the credibility of these findings [20, 21, 22, 23, 24].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…The funnel plot, a scatter plot of effect sizes against their standard errors, was visually inspected for asymmetry. In this analysis, the funnel plot did not show significant asymmetry, suggesting a low risk of publication bias [20, 21, 22, 23, 24].…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 82%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Meanwhile, coenzyme Q10 did not significantly improve the NYHA cardiac function in patients with heart failure, which is consistent with the results of a previous examination [29]. In this study, we found that coenzyme Q10 can improve exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure; however, in the investigation conducted by Madmani [30], this improvement was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The primary outcome, ejection fraction, showed a notable increase, indicating an enhancement in systolic performance. This finding aligns with previous studies suggesting that CoQ10 plays a crucial role in improving cardiac function by enhancing mitochondrial energy production and reducing oxidative stress [3,4,7,8,15].…”
Section: Principal Findings
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Both fixed-effect and random-effects models provided similar effect sizes and confidence intervals, reinforcing the consistency of the results [3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 15].…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results, as excluding high-risk studies and using alternative statistical models did not significantly alter the outcomes [3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 15]. Publication bias was assessed and found to be low, further supporting the credibility of these findings [20, 21, 22, 23, 24].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…The funnel plot, a scatter plot of effect sizes against their standard errors, was visually inspected for asymmetry. In this analysis, the funnel plot did not show significant asymmetry, suggesting a low risk of publication bias [20, 21, 22, 23, 24].…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 82%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Meanwhile, coenzyme Q10 did not significantly improve the NYHA cardiac function in patients with heart failure, which is consistent with the results of a previous examination [29]. In this study, we found that coenzyme Q10 can improve exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure; however, in the investigation conducted by Madmani [30], this improvement was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The primary outcome, ejection fraction, showed a notable increase, indicating an enhancement in systolic performance. This finding aligns with previous studies suggesting that CoQ10 plays a crucial role in improving cardiac function by enhancing mitochondrial energy production and reducing oxidative stress [3,4,7,8,15].…”
Section: Principal Findings
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Both fixed-effect and random-effects models provided similar effect sizes and confidence intervals, reinforcing the consistency of the results [3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 15].…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results, as excluding high-risk studies and using alternative statistical models did not significantly alter the outcomes [3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 15]. Publication bias was assessed and found to be low, further supporting the credibility of these findings [20, 21, 22, 23, 24].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…The funnel plot, a scatter plot of effect sizes against their standard errors, was visually inspected for asymmetry. In this analysis, the funnel plot did not show significant asymmetry, suggesting a low risk of publication bias [20, 21, 22, 23, 24].…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 82%