In searches for homology among nucleotide binding proteins, recent reports have described primary structure alignments for stretches of 30 or so amino acid residues among a variety of proteins including the ray and oncogene products. The significance of these sequence matches has been tested by searching in available data banks for certain conserved residue patterns rcsulting from the alignments. The tests suggest that alignments over these limited stretches are not necessarily justifiable and any implications for residues involved in nucleotide binding must be viewed with caution.With recent advances in the technology of DNA sequencing, the primary structures of many proteins have been elucidated. 'This plethora of data has, probably because of the grcater effort and time required to obtain tertiary structural information, prompted searches for amino acid sequence homologies amongst proteins of known and unknown threedimensional structure. This is particularly so if the various proteins can be related by some common biochemical property. In cases where the sequence matches can be delineated for a 100 or more contiguous residues, with small and few insertions and deletions, the homology would appear significant. For other situations. only a short stretch of 15 to 35 amino acids in length has been reported for proteins consisting of 200 or more amino acids. Arguments for significance in these instances generally center on the alignment of such regions in scveral proteins with similar functions as well as a comparatively high perccntage of amino acid identity which is in the vicinity of 30-40%.Since many proteins bind nucleotides such a s GTP, ADP, or NAD and since conserved marker residues have been identified in the primary, secondary and tertiary structures of NAD-binding dehydrogenases [I ~ 31, there are many examplcs in the recent scientific literature suggesting nucleotide binding regions in proteins through alignment of short scquence spans. The current molecular biology interest in oncogene products has produced a wealth of amino acid scquence data and concomittant attempts to establish functional, structural or possibly evolutionary relationships between these proteins and non-oncogenic proteins of cstablished function and structure. I n this rcport homology studics of oncogene products which possess nucleotide binding properties will be considered: namely, thc rus group of proteins which bind GTP and the src group which bind ATP. By combining alignments from several recent reports through the use of common sequences (e. g. dehydrogenases), particular residue patterns were made salient. Searches of protein sc-