2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coculture of monkey ovarian tissue increases survival after vitrification and slow-rate freezing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower concentrations of cryoprotectant are required in freezing media for slow cooling, which reduces the risk of toxic and osmotic damage to cells, but this is insufficient to prevent ice crystal formation jeopardizing cell survival during the freezing procedures (Vajta 2006). Vitrification, though still regarded as a relatively novel freezing method, has recently been reported as an effective alternative method for the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue in various species, including mouse (Wang et al 2009), rat (Deng et al 2009), pig (Gandolfi et al 2006), goat (Santos et al 2007), sheep (Al-aghbari & Menino 2002, Courbiere et al 2006, monkey (Yeoman et al 2005), and human (Keros et al 2009, Zhou et al 2010. It combines a high cooling rate with a high concentration of cryoprotectant in the vitrification media, which rapidly dehydrates the cells and prevents water from precipitating as ice (Vajta 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower concentrations of cryoprotectant are required in freezing media for slow cooling, which reduces the risk of toxic and osmotic damage to cells, but this is insufficient to prevent ice crystal formation jeopardizing cell survival during the freezing procedures (Vajta 2006). Vitrification, though still regarded as a relatively novel freezing method, has recently been reported as an effective alternative method for the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue in various species, including mouse (Wang et al 2009), rat (Deng et al 2009), pig (Gandolfi et al 2006), goat (Santos et al 2007), sheep (Al-aghbari & Menino 2002, Courbiere et al 2006, monkey (Yeoman et al 2005), and human (Keros et al 2009, Zhou et al 2010. It combines a high cooling rate with a high concentration of cryoprotectant in the vitrification media, which rapidly dehydrates the cells and prevents water from precipitating as ice (Vajta 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this method, tissue samples are normally placed in a very small volume of vitrification solution and cooled on a sterile metal surface to maximize the cooling rate, and minimize the potential for contamination of samples by LN 2 . Measures of survival of vitrified ovarian tissue after cryopreservation have included morphological examination (histology), viability assessment by viability staining or development in vitro or in vivo culture (Yeoman et al 2005, Santos et al 2007, Aerts et al 2008. There are, however, limited data on the effects on the function of ovarian tissue vitrified using solid surface vitrification systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is one study on ovarian cortex from macaques when vitrification (3.4 M GLY, 4.5 M EG) and slow freezing (1.5 M EG) were compared and evaluated whether post-thawing coculture on feeder cells (mouse fetal fibroblas t m o n o l a y e r ) w i t h a d d i t i o n o f f o l l i c l e stimulating hormone, insulin, transferrin and selenium, would increase viability (Yeoman et al, 2005). The post-thaw viability, as assessed by live-dead fluorescent staining, was comparable (around 70%) in the two groups, which was only marginally lower than the follicular viability of the fresh tissue (76%).…”
Section: Non-human Primatesmentioning
confidence: 99%