2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-017-1189-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coblation Versus Conventional Tonsillectomy: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, these results are consistent with the study by El-Taher and Aref (14) which showed that the mean operating time was 10.63±2.45 min in the coblation group and 30.66±8.66 min in the conventional group, meaning that the coblation group's mean operation time was much reduced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, these results are consistent with the study by El-Taher and Aref (14) which showed that the mean operating time was 10.63±2.45 min in the coblation group and 30.66±8.66 min in the conventional group, meaning that the coblation group's mean operation time was much reduced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In some studies, there is no strong evidence to suggest that the coblation technique exhibits any benefit or increases the risk of primary and secondary hemorrhage when compared to other techniques[ 25 ]. Nevertheless, another study found that the coblation technique was associated with higher incidence of secondary tonsillectomy hemorrhage[ 26 ]. Coblation patients have higher rates of postoperative bleeding than electric monopolar cautery patients[ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the coblation has been widely used in clinical settings. It had several advantages like less tissue destruction, clear field, decreased wound, and less blood loss during surgery [11] . Therefore, this method had become increasingly used in tonsillectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%