2008
DOI: 10.1080/14649350701843846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coasts for Sale: Gentrification in New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with the development of exurbia, with which it shares amenity and demographic characteristics, distinctive retirement and holiday areas are emerging as the vanguard of lifestyle settlements which Lee and McDermott (1998) suggest will become a major component of population distribution in New Zealand in the twenty-first century (see also Freeman and Cheyne, 2008;Goodyear, 2006;Sanson, Cook and Fairweather, 2004).…”
Section: Rural Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with the development of exurbia, with which it shares amenity and demographic characteristics, distinctive retirement and holiday areas are emerging as the vanguard of lifestyle settlements which Lee and McDermott (1998) suggest will become a major component of population distribution in New Zealand in the twenty-first century (see also Freeman and Cheyne, 2008;Goodyear, 2006;Sanson, Cook and Fairweather, 2004).…”
Section: Rural Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Countries that experienced this trend include the US , the UK (Phillips et al, 2008), Australia (Gibson et al, 2005), New Zealand (Freeman and Cheyne, 2008), Sweden (Borgegård et al, 1995;Westlund, 2002) and Spain (Solana-Solana, 2010). Through this process, wealthy urban residents who were driven by a desire to escape the city and to connect to an idealised rural space became a key source of rural population growth .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La presencia de actividades pesqueras o agrícolas ejercidas por comunidades tradicionales de pescadores o agricultores implica rentas del suelo bajas que son potencialmente ampliables a rentas de monopolio, mediante la acción de los agentes inmobiliarios. Ello implica, en el peor de los casos, la expulsión de población local y la llegada de los migrantes por amenidades, cuya consecuencia es un fenómeno que algunos asocian a una especie de gentrificación litoral, descrita en diferentes contextos (Kahn, Vaughn & Zasloff, 2010;Griffith, 2000;Freeman & Cheyne, 2008;Collins, 2013;Colburn & Jepson, 2012;Gil de Lamadrid, 2008). En el mejor de los casos, la población local no es expulsada: los turistas residenciales en estas nuevas localidades no son considerados como algo negativo por la población local, ya que no se percibe que compitan en el mercado de trabajo; incluso residen en núcleos urbanos tradicionales alejados de los macroproyectos (Mantecón, 2011).…”
Section: Utopólis Y Distópolis Costeras En Un Contexto De Metropolizaunclassified