Co-option, control and criticality: the politics of relevance regimes for the future of political science

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, the notion of relevance vis-à-vis political science became not only a subject of academic debates but also a domain of practice, largely due to the developments in the research funding, increasingly referred to as the 'impact agenda'. In this article, we explore how the growing focus on socio-economic impact as the assessment criterion of research funding shapes the discipline of political science itself-its knowledge production, dissemination and the emergent forms of accountability of political scientists. The article presents the results of a major international study that has examined the emergence of 'impact agendas' across 33 countries. We report on the changing idea of relevance of political science through the lens of its strategic ambiguity and historical evolution. We then explore these broader trends through an in-depth analysis of the UK as an 'extreme case' and a blueprint for funding system reforms. These developments, we argue, are not a mere funding policy innovation but rather a paradigm-level change, reshaping the position of political science in society as well as the types of scholarship that are possible and incentivised.

Looking back and looking forward: 20 years of European Political Science serving the political science community in Europe and beyond

“…Ersoy and Karakoç (2021) examine this challenge from the perspective of academic freedom in Turkey. Finally, Bandola-Gill et al (2021) close the issue with another important topic, the relevance of political science, by examining the emergence of so-called impact agendas across many countries.…”

European Political Science versus the Pandemic: Patterns of Professional Adaptation

“…Thus, political scientists seem to shape a diversified community from both cognitive and professional points of view. In Europe, these diversities are reinforced by changing perceptions about the community’s shifting borders ( Paternotte and Verloo, 2020 ) and the different roles played by political scientists from one political system to another ( Bandola-Gill et al, 2021 ). Thus, the focus on EPSs can help understand whether and how diversified endogenous and contextual national conditions can drive scholars’ potential reactions as they face the abrupt effects of the pandemic.…”