2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12961-016-0104-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use

Abstract: Scientific collaboration networks are a hallmark of contemporary academic research. Researchers are no longer independent players, but members of teams that bring together complementary skills and multidisciplinary approaches around common goals. Social network analysis and co-authorship networks are increasingly used as powerful tools to assess collaboration trends and to identify leading scientists and organizations. The analysis reveals the social structure of the networks by identifying actors and their co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
120
1
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
120
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis was based on SNA methods, as described by Fonseca et al [18]. SNA is a theoretical approach that uses a set of techniques to understand and quantify the relations between members of a network (nodes or actors), which can be individuals, groups, organisations and even whole countries [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis was based on SNA methods, as described by Fonseca et al [18]. SNA is a theoretical approach that uses a set of techniques to understand and quantify the relations between members of a network (nodes or actors), which can be individuals, groups, organisations and even whole countries [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicators at the individual level describe the importance of a particular node relative to all other nodes, based on the nature of its interactions. Centrality measures are the most used in SNA to identify the nodes that have strategic significance in the network [18]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNA and co-authorship networks are being increasingly used as powerful tools to assess collaboration trends and to identify leading scientists and organisations in health studies (Fonseca et al 2016). The analysis reveals the social structure of the networks by identifying actors (researchers, organisations, countries etc.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on multiple topics have used bibliometric analysis [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. The review policies and analysis topics focused on using co-authors or co-words [28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Moreover, there is a study that monitored the development process by analyzing trends and issues on specific topics [10,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%