2015
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CM5, a pre-Swarm comprehensive geomagnetic field model derived from over 12 yr of CHAMP, Ørsted, SAC-C and observatory data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
170
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
170
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6a). Furthermore, this offset is in the range of recently reported offsets amounting to −9.1 nT needed for the RCE to match annual averages of CHAMP Z M values (Lühr et al 2017) and −10 nT needed to match the −q 0 1 SH coefficient of the CM5 geomagnetic model (Sabaka et al 2015). The significance of both these comparisons is partially restricted by the fact that AMC includes secondary induced signals in addition to the direct external field and did not undergo any subjective quiet-time selection procedure.…”
Section: Amc Absolute Levelmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6a). Furthermore, this offset is in the range of recently reported offsets amounting to −9.1 nT needed for the RCE to match annual averages of CHAMP Z M values (Lühr et al 2017) and −10 nT needed to match the −q 0 1 SH coefficient of the CM5 geomagnetic model (Sabaka et al 2015). The significance of both these comparisons is partially restricted by the fact that AMC includes secondary induced signals in addition to the direct external field and did not undergo any subjective quiet-time selection procedure.…”
Section: Amc Absolute Levelmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Further options apart from these are the CHAOS (Finlay et al 2016, version six) and CM (Sabaka et al 2015, version five) model series. We reject both in order to preserve independence of the RC index, which is used in the latest versions of both these series.…”
Section: Large-scale External Field Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their technique is suitable to include satellite data as well as ground measurements. Sabaka et al (2002) used a "comprehensive approach", which simultaneously determines the magnetic potentials for magnetospheric, ionospheric, and underground sources by the use of satellite and ground data. The ionospheric source represents the Sq-EEJ current system.…”
Section: Spherical Harmonic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionospheric source represents the Sq-EEJ current system. Figure 25 shows the ionospheric current system derived from the latest version of their model, CM5 (Sabaka et al 2015). Note how the currents are constrained by the magnetic equator.…”
Section: Spherical Harmonic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The Comprehensive Inversion (CM) family, of which the latest published version is CM5 [34]. The Swarm Level 2 Data Product: Comprehensive Inversion (CI) [38] has been produced using a similar method but using only Swarm data.…”
Section: Robustness Of Jet Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%