2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1292418/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Close relatives of MERS-CoV in bats use ACE2 as their functional receptors

Abstract: Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and several bat coronaviruses employ Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) as their functional receptors. However, the receptor for NeoCoV, the closest MERS-CoV relative yet discovered in bats, remains enigmatic. In this study, we unexpectedly found that NeoCoV and its close relative, PDF-2180-CoV, can efficiently use some types of bat Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and, less favorably, human ACE2 for entry. The two viruses use their spikes' S1 subunit ca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we did find evidence of selection in residues 321 and 326 in both bats and non-bat mammals (figure 1 c ; electronic supplementary material, table S3, MEME, p < 0.05), as well as selection in bats in residue 322 (figure 1 c ; electronic supplementary material, table S3, MEME, p < 0.05); these three residues contact HCoV-NL63 but not SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2. This finding contrasts with the findings of a smaller dataset of bats mostly from Europe, Asia and Africa which found no evidence of selection due to HCoV-NL63 [9] and may result from our greater power to detect signal or signal originating from bats in different regions than previously tested [31,32]. Recent evidence suggests that some MERS-CoV-related viruses use ACE2 as their host receptor [31], so this signal could be driven by coronaviruses from outside the SARS-related clade.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…However, we did find evidence of selection in residues 321 and 326 in both bats and non-bat mammals (figure 1 c ; electronic supplementary material, table S3, MEME, p < 0.05), as well as selection in bats in residue 322 (figure 1 c ; electronic supplementary material, table S3, MEME, p < 0.05); these three residues contact HCoV-NL63 but not SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2. This finding contrasts with the findings of a smaller dataset of bats mostly from Europe, Asia and Africa which found no evidence of selection due to HCoV-NL63 [9] and may result from our greater power to detect signal or signal originating from bats in different regions than previously tested [31,32]. Recent evidence suggests that some MERS-CoV-related viruses use ACE2 as their host receptor [31], so this signal could be driven by coronaviruses from outside the SARS-related clade.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…The first two genera can infect mammals (bats and humans), whereas the latter primarily infect birds and, sometimes, mammals. Most coronaviruses that infect humans are believed to have originated in bats—the key mammalian coronavirus reservoir ( 1 , 2 ). Bat-CoVs have received particular attention since several recently seen CoVs have been associated with unexpected disease outbreaks in the present century, causing high fatality rates and significant economic impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bat-CoVs have received particular attention since several recently seen CoVs have been associated with unexpected disease outbreaks in the present century, causing high fatality rates and significant economic impact. Three such viruses suggested to be transmitted from bats to humans include Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and the latest Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) ( 2 , 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations