2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
101
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
101
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Soer et al recently established minimally clinical important differences in EQ-5D of 0.03 for chronic low back pain patients after multidisciplinary treatment at a specialty centre for spinal disorders (31). The majority of the patients in this study were chronic low back pain patients (similar to the patients studied by Soer et al).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Soer et al recently established minimally clinical important differences in EQ-5D of 0.03 for chronic low back pain patients after multidisciplinary treatment at a specialty centre for spinal disorders (31). The majority of the patients in this study were chronic low back pain patients (similar to the patients studied by Soer et al).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Walters and Brazier [19] also used the one half SD method, which produced slightly larger MIDs. In a Netherlands study, Soer et al [41] estimated the MID for patients with chronic back pain to be 0.03. Marra et al [22] estimated the MID for rheumatoid arthritis to be 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective sample size calculation was made for this study using the EQ VAS, which have the suggested minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of 10.5 units (Soer et al, 2012a). Calculation showed that 63 patients in each group would have been sufficient to detect differences in MCIC at the p < 0.05 level, with a power of 80%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the subjects are asked to rate their current health state on a vertical visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) with the endpoints 0 (worst imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). The EQ-5D has evidence of validity and reliability in different musculoskeletal disorders (Soer et al, 2012a) and orthopaedics (Beard et al, 2010;Devine et al, 2011). The Swedish version of the EQ-5D was used for this study.…”
Section: Health-related Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%