2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9159-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicopathologic factors associated with false negative FDG–PET in primary breast cancer

Abstract: In present study, tumor size and tumor grade are independent factors that predict FDG-PET results. Smaller tumors (< or =10 mm) and low-grade tumors are strong predictor of FN FDG-PET results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
122
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
122
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, 79 lesions were evaluated in 78 patients. In our institute, the 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan is performed for tumors larger than 1.0 cm in diameter because of the frequency of false-negative PET results in tumors of diameter less than 1.0 cm [6]. Breast carcinoma was diagnosed by recent trocar needle biopsy in all patients before 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging.…”
Section: Methods Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, 79 lesions were evaluated in 78 patients. In our institute, the 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan is performed for tumors larger than 1.0 cm in diameter because of the frequency of false-negative PET results in tumors of diameter less than 1.0 cm [6]. Breast carcinoma was diagnosed by recent trocar needle biopsy in all patients before 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging.…”
Section: Methods Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also observed that the SUV max was related directly to primary tumor size in patients with breast cancer. 25 We have demonstrated that the SUV max increases as tumor size increases, and vice versa. Kidd et al demonstrated that the SUV max is a stronger predictor of overall survival than tumor volume or lymph node status.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This is due to the limited spatial resolution of PET and, in some cases, by tumor characteristics (e.g., low FDG avidity in grade 1 cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ, or lobular carcinoma) [1,2]. Specificity can also be altered by variations of FDG uptake in certain benign conditions, such as infection, fibroadenoma, ductal adenoma, inflammatory granulomatous mastitis, and fibrocystic changes [3].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%