2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinically Significant Fibrosis Is Associated With Longitudinal Increases in Fibrosis-4 and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis Scores

Abstract: Conclusions: Non-invasively measured fibrosis scores increase progressively in patients with NAFLD and CSF. Further studies are needed to determine whether repeated measurements can identify patients at risk for CSF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, 15% of NASH patients develop hepatic fibrosis ultimately leading to cirrhosis. Pathologically, fibrosis staging using Brunt classification [15] but not the NAFLD scoring system has been shown to be an important factor in event occurrence [16] . Clinically, imaging modalities and liver fibrosis scoring systems such as the FIB-4 index are available [9] and are useful to some extent for assessing hepatic fibrosis [17,18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, 15% of NASH patients develop hepatic fibrosis ultimately leading to cirrhosis. Pathologically, fibrosis staging using Brunt classification [15] but not the NAFLD scoring system has been shown to be an important factor in event occurrence [16] . Clinically, imaging modalities and liver fibrosis scoring systems such as the FIB-4 index are available [9] and are useful to some extent for assessing hepatic fibrosis [17,18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathologically, fibrosis staging using Brunt classification [15] but not the NAFLD scoring system has been shown to be an important factor in event occurrence. [16] Clinically, imaging modalities and liver fibrosis scoring systems such as the FIB-4 index are available [9] and are useful to some extent for assessing hepatic fibrosis. [17,18] However, they are not sufficiently accurate for assessing the development of liver fibrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most known techniques approved by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) [ 122 ] include NAFLD liver fat score (NLFS) and the fatty liver index (FLI) for NAFLD diagnosis [ 123 ], and fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) for fibrosis assessment [ 124 ]. Also, known the SteatoTest, NashTest, ActiTest, FibroTest, and FibroScan are handy tools in quantifying liver impairment [ 125 ].…”
Section: Screening and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, no patient with low‐risk NFS developed liver decompensation or liver‐related mortality. Following repeat NFS at the end of follow‐up, all patients with a liver‐related complication were in the high‐risk NFS category, suggesting that longitudinal changes in the NFS score ( 21 ) may have a role in predicting adverse liver outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%