2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical risk score correlates with yield of PET scan in patients with colorectal hepatic metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inclusion of tumour-related factors in our study has shown that liver lesion factors are important determinants on their own but were not significant in multivariate analysis. Disease-free interval was shown in some previous studies to be an important factor that predicts extrahepatic disease [2]. In our study and the study by Pawlik et al [7], time interval was not a significant factor in prediction of behaviour of colorectal cancer spread.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Inclusion of tumour-related factors in our study has shown that liver lesion factors are important determinants on their own but were not significant in multivariate analysis. Disease-free interval was shown in some previous studies to be an important factor that predicts extrahepatic disease [2]. In our study and the study by Pawlik et al [7], time interval was not a significant factor in prediction of behaviour of colorectal cancer spread.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…FDG-PET scan detects extrahepatic metastases in 20% of patients with colorectal liver metastases but it is reported to have approximately 16% false negative rates [2]. Positron emission tomography with the glucose analog [ 18 F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose is a sensitive diagnostic test that detects tumours based on the increased metabolic utilisation of glucose by tumour cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By means of an FDG-PET these metastases might have been detected, resulting in less disease recurrence, which might explain the trend towards a different DFS. In patients with a low CRS there is a minimal risk of occult metastatic disease and the added value of a FDG-PET is therefore limited, if not absent [22]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this series, the Fong et al [10] CRS should not be used to rationalize the use of PET/CT in those patients being investigated for potential resection of CRLM [23]. Schüssler-Fiorenza et al [22] evaluated whether the CRS correlates with the yield of FDG-PET in patients with CRLM. There was a significant association between the CRS and the yield on the FDG-PET scan and they concluded that patients with a low CRS do not benefit from a FDG-PET.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%