2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13326-018-0179-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Natural Language Processing in languages other than English: opportunities and challenges

Abstract: BackgroundNatural language processing applied to clinical text or aimed at a clinical outcome has been thriving in recent years. This paper offers the first broad overview of clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP) for languages other than English. Recent studies are summarized to offer insights and outline opportunities in this area.Main BodyWe envision three groups of intended readers: (1) NLP researchers leveraging experience gained in other languages, (2) NLP researchers faced with establishing clinical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
116
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
1
116
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This situa- 2 Wu et al [29,Table 3(b)] found that 71% of the corpora they screened were English, 20% Chinese, 2% Spanish, Japanese or Finnish and all other languages ranked below 1%. For a survey on medical NLP dealing explicitly with languages other than English, see [36]. tion might be remedied by a recently proposed common evaluation framework for biomedical NLP, the BLUE (Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation) benchmark 3 [22], which consists of five different biomedical NLP tasks (including NER and REX) with ten corpora (including BC5CDR, DDI, and i2b2 that also occur in the tables below), or the one proposed by Chauhan et al [37] 4 enabling a more lucid comparison of various training methodologies, pre-processing, modeling techniques, and evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Deep Neural Network For Medical Information Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situa- 2 Wu et al [29,Table 3(b)] found that 71% of the corpora they screened were English, 20% Chinese, 2% Spanish, Japanese or Finnish and all other languages ranked below 1%. For a survey on medical NLP dealing explicitly with languages other than English, see [36]. tion might be remedied by a recently proposed common evaluation framework for biomedical NLP, the BLUE (Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation) benchmark 3 [22], which consists of five different biomedical NLP tasks (including NER and REX) with ten corpora (including BC5CDR, DDI, and i2b2 that also occur in the tables below), or the one proposed by Chauhan et al [37] 4 enabling a more lucid comparison of various training methodologies, pre-processing, modeling techniques, and evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Deep Neural Network For Medical Information Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, J. Luo, M. Wu, et al in their review [11] draw attention to the fact that the application of artificial intelligence technologies and Big Data to solve health problems based on EHC has its own specifics and differs from such areas biomedical informatics, as computer modeling of organs, image processing and analysis, genome research. In this context, the researchers such as L. Luo, L. Li, J. Hu, et al [12]; K. Kreimeyer, M. Foster, A. Pandey, et al [13]; A. Névéol, H. Dalianis, S. Velupillai, et al [14] highlight the problem of extracting objective information from medical texts included in EHR. They note the objectivity of the fact that there are many natural language processing systems (NLP) for English medical texts processing.…”
Section: Big Biomedical Data Mining: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of those problems is related to formulate the question or query that should include all important information without ambiguity and about the information retrieval. Névéol et al [3] had identified the opportunities and challenges to work with clinical natural language processing. They had also described the problems with different methods/algorithms with respect to language context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%