Magnetoencephalography 2011
DOI: 10.5772/27256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical MEG Analyses for Children with Intractable Epilepsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifteen 2-minute segments of resting-state data were recorded with concurrent MEG and 10-20 scalp EEG. The data were sampled at 625 Hz, as previously published, 17,18 and for a minority of patients, the data were sampled at 1,250 Hz and down-sampled to 625 Hz. Each epoch of data was classified by state of vigilance (i.e., awake or drowsy/asleep) by an experienced neurophysiologist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen 2-minute segments of resting-state data were recorded with concurrent MEG and 10-20 scalp EEG. The data were sampled at 625 Hz, as previously published, 17,18 and for a minority of patients, the data were sampled at 1,250 Hz and down-sampled to 625 Hz. Each epoch of data was classified by state of vigilance (i.e., awake or drowsy/asleep) by an experienced neurophysiologist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostly for very high cycle fatigue, it is possible to find inside the fish-eye a fine granular structure particularly rough and circular around particles, which is called FGA (Fine Granular Area) [6]. Several names have been given to this zone: ODA (Optically Dark Area), GBF (Granular Bright Facet) or also RSA (Rough Surface Area) [3,[6][7][8][9]. The formation of the FGA is expected to enhance the fatigue lifetime for internal cracks [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sets of candidate timepoints and sensors obtained were used for subsequent automated ECD estimation. Regarding the automated ECD estimation, we mimicked the workflow of routine manual ECD analysis and applied the following process to exclude artifacts and false positives [31]. First, we performed ECD estimation at 15 timepoints before and after 7 ms of the detected candidate time point and excluded those ECDs with Goodness of Fit (GoF) < 0.95 and an ECD intensity smaller than 50 nAm, or larger than 400 nAm.…”
Section: Famed Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the distance between each remaining ECD position and its center of gravity did not exceed 2 cm, the point with the highest intensity among the candidate points was adopted as the point at which the final ECD estimation should be performed. We set each of the parameters described above concerning the results of the segmentation performance and previous studies [31]- [33]. The parameters for applying DBSCAN clustering were set to eps as 0.03, and minPts as 4.…”
Section: Famed Performancementioning
confidence: 99%