1993
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Clinical Grading of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defects
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
43
7
5
5
Citation Types
1
41
0
0
Year Published
Range
1995
19952026
2026Publication Types
Select...
40
12
1
Relationship
0
53
Authors
Journals
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
References 6 publications
1
41
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The various risk factors as described by various studies can be seen in Table 2. Known risk factors were also associated in the patient study like previous studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Early reporting (< 2weeks) of NAAION cases in a tertiary institute of northeast India was found to be low in the study.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 58%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The various risk factors as described by various studies can be seen in Table 2. Known risk factors were also associated in the patient study like previous studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Early reporting (< 2weeks) of NAAION cases in a tertiary institute of northeast India was found to be low in the study.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 58%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Three examiners, including a neuro-ophthalmologist, on separate visits followed the appropriate protocol (as described in the methods section) for diagnosing and grading a RAPD. 6 Each examiner concurred that a clinically detectable RAPD was not present. It may be argued that more sensitive methods such as pupillometry would have detected a RAPD.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Such a bias may manifest more in cases with mild rather than moderate or severe neuro-ophthalmic disease. This hypothesis was tested by dividing the cases into those with Grades I and II RAPD (mild RAPD; n=50 out of 77) and Grade III or higher RAPD (moderate RAPD; n=22 of 77), based on their clinical records ( 4 ). Controls data were randomly sampled to match the number of cases for this analysis.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The various risk factors as described by various studies can be seen in Table 2. Known risk factors were also associated in the patient study like previous studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Early reporting (< 2weeks) of NAAION cases in a tertiary institute of northeast India was found to be low in the study.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 58%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Three examiners, including a neuro-ophthalmologist, on separate visits followed the appropriate protocol (as described in the methods section) for diagnosing and grading a RAPD. 6 Each examiner concurred that a clinically detectable RAPD was not present. It may be argued that more sensitive methods such as pupillometry would have detected a RAPD.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Such a bias may manifest more in cases with mild rather than moderate or severe neuro-ophthalmic disease. This hypothesis was tested by dividing the cases into those with Grades I and II RAPD (mild RAPD; n=50 out of 77) and Grade III or higher RAPD (moderate RAPD; n=22 of 77), based on their clinical records ( 4 ). Controls data were randomly sampled to match the number of cases for this analysis.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The various risk factors as described by various studies can be seen in Table 2. Known risk factors were also associated in the patient study like previous studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Early reporting (< 2weeks) of NAAION cases in a tertiary institute of northeast India was found to be low in the study.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 58%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Three examiners, including a neuro-ophthalmologist, on separate visits followed the appropriate protocol (as described in the methods section) for diagnosing and grading a RAPD. 6 Each examiner concurred that a clinically detectable RAPD was not present. It may be argued that more sensitive methods such as pupillometry would have detected a RAPD.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Such a bias may manifest more in cases with mild rather than moderate or severe neuro-ophthalmic disease. This hypothesis was tested by dividing the cases into those with Grades I and II RAPD (mild RAPD; n=50 out of 77) and Grade III or higher RAPD (moderate RAPD; n=22 of 77), based on their clinical records ( 4 ). Controls data were randomly sampled to match the number of cases for this analysis.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%