1999
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430613.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical experience using intrathecal (IT) bupivacaine infusion in three patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS‐I)

Abstract: The IT pain treatment with bupivacaine (with or without buprenorphine) alleviated the "refractory" pain, but affected neither the associated symptoms and signs of the CRPS-I, nor its natural evolution. Thus, the IT treatment cannot be recommended in preference to other pain treatment regimens for CRPS-I.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are small case series of efficacy of intrathecal morphine [43]. One small case series found intrathecal bupivicaine to be ineffective [68]. Baclofen is the only intrathecal agent whose efficacy in CRPS is supported significantly in the literature.…”
Section: Treatment Options Using An Indwelling Intrathecal Catheter Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are small case series of efficacy of intrathecal morphine [43]. One small case series found intrathecal bupivicaine to be ineffective [68]. Baclofen is the only intrathecal agent whose efficacy in CRPS is supported significantly in the literature.…”
Section: Treatment Options Using An Indwelling Intrathecal Catheter Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcome variables after an amputation such as quality of life have been infrequently reported [8]. Previously, there was insufficient evidence that amputation positively contributes to the treatment of CRPS-I, with just a few published case studies with positive outcomes [2,7,9,10]. Guidelines warn against amputation because of the risk of recurrence of the syndrome due to their referral to one or two larger studies with predominantly negative outcomes [5,[11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pediatric population, intrathecal infusions have been successfully utilized to treat severe cancer pain and CRPS I . Intrathecal administration of both opioids and local anesthetics has been described in children . Farid and Heiner successfully treated an 8‐year‐old girl with chronic left foot pain by placing an intrathecal catheter at the L4‐5 spinal space and infusing 0.2% ropivacaine at 0.03 mg/kg/h for 1 week .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%